Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Beguilers and the Spell Compendium
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="smootrk" data-source="post: 2922227" data-attributes="member: 28583"><p>I believe that I already addressed that I feel differently... that the Spell Compendium was not used simply because WotC did not want to force another book simply to utilize the class as presented in the PHB2. I also agree that the Advanced Learning ability is tailor made to address the myriad of other sources - be it Forgotten Realms Books, Kalamar Books, Eberron Books, other Third Party Books, etc. the list goes on and on. Five additional spells added to the list over 20 levels is a little light for my tastes, especially with the gamut of available and thematically congruous choices that are out there. Again, I understand the Rules Lawyering point of view that since it was not already explicitly printed to include the Spell Compendium, that one must be exceedingly careful about any additions, but a specialist in a certain limited range of spells would IMO have access to at least some of the additional spells that fit that criteria.</p><p></p><p>So, if you feel otherwise, great... but why bother to post? If you think there are a few spells that seem obviously appropriate, please feel free to share your thoughts. I just want a few suggestions (and possibly rationales) on some potentials for addition. I am not nearly as judgmental on the subject as others apparently are.</p><p></p><p>And no offense is meant to any who have posted here. I fully understand alternate points of view on this, and I appreciate that difference in judging style.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="smootrk, post: 2922227, member: 28583"] I believe that I already addressed that I feel differently... that the Spell Compendium was not used simply because WotC did not want to force another book simply to utilize the class as presented in the PHB2. I also agree that the Advanced Learning ability is tailor made to address the myriad of other sources - be it Forgotten Realms Books, Kalamar Books, Eberron Books, other Third Party Books, etc. the list goes on and on. Five additional spells added to the list over 20 levels is a little light for my tastes, especially with the gamut of available and thematically congruous choices that are out there. Again, I understand the Rules Lawyering point of view that since it was not already explicitly printed to include the Spell Compendium, that one must be exceedingly careful about any additions, but a specialist in a certain limited range of spells would IMO have access to at least some of the additional spells that fit that criteria. So, if you feel otherwise, great... but why bother to post? If you think there are a few spells that seem obviously appropriate, please feel free to share your thoughts. I just want a few suggestions (and possibly rationales) on some potentials for addition. I am not nearly as judgmental on the subject as others apparently are. And no offense is meant to any who have posted here. I fully understand alternate points of view on this, and I appreciate that difference in judging style. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Beguilers and the Spell Compendium
Top