Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Beguilers & Warmages can learn any spell
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="satori01" data-source="post: 2856665" data-attributes="member: 7859"><p>For the most part I agree with you Thanee, with a lot of caveats. Being able to "learn" spells is so poorly and contradictory defined as to be an almost meaningless term.</p><p></p><p>Looking at the Base Classes that "learn" spells as described under the class abillity section we have:</p><p>Wizard, Bard, Sorcerer, Archivist, Hexblade, Shugenja, Wu Jen, and Spellthief. </p><p></p><p>Presumbly the Favored Soul should be on that list, but under its spell description it makes no mention of learning spells beyond replacing old known spells with new spells every X level like a Sorcerer.</p><p></p><p>This is the issue I have in general with the feat and spell section, a lack of percision in the writting.</p><p></p><p>Learn can be used in a very technical percise sense, and it can be used as flavor text. Sorcerers like Wizards, "learn" their spells, despite the fact the flavor of the Sorcerer is anything but scholarly. Meanwhile back at the war college, where Warmages are described as "learning" their spells they are in fact just Knowing every spell on their spell list. The Advance Learning class feature is more apply described in game terms as Expanded Spell list.</p><p></p><p>To make matter worse, WOTC did a half measure when designing the Warmage. Realistically the entire concept of Spells Known, should be replaced with Only Knows and can Cast all spell on the class list. This is the wording for the Dread Necromancer. As we all know the Warmage and Beguiler have Spells known = Spell list clause.</p><p></p><p>Thus when Extra Spell talks about "learning" a spell we have to ask is this technical learning or descriptive learning?</p><p>Even if Extra Spell is technical learning we are still left with the problem of the Fiend Blood PrC and the Fiendish Learning ability, where it only adds to your Spells Known. "Essentially" Warmages and Beguilers still do have Spells Known, and thus would add any spell "learned" to their Spell List. Of course the poor little Sorcerer, could then "learn" say Speak with Dead, but never cast it.</p><p></p><p>We also do not know if "learning" a spell in context of the Extra Spell Feat means it is added to one's class spell list.</p><p>Indeed, beyond the line in Class Abillities about Bards and Sorcerers be able to "learn" spells, in the Magic section of the PHB it only refers to Bards and Sorcerers as adding to their Spells Known with level increases, never to "learning" new spells. This is a similiar mechanism that Warmages, Dread Necromancers, and Beguilers have, Warmages et all just add a lot more spells to their known spell list.</p><p></p><p>Suddenly through all of the morass of the rules, I wonder if you can even talk of "learning" spells as a technical term, especially as </p><p>the Favored Soul, being a divine sorcerer should then have the concept in its Spell section of Class Abilities, which it doesnt.</p><p></p><p>"learning" spells is similiar to the Right of Privacy in the American Legal system, more inference than spelled out.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="satori01, post: 2856665, member: 7859"] For the most part I agree with you Thanee, with a lot of caveats. Being able to "learn" spells is so poorly and contradictory defined as to be an almost meaningless term. Looking at the Base Classes that "learn" spells as described under the class abillity section we have: Wizard, Bard, Sorcerer, Archivist, Hexblade, Shugenja, Wu Jen, and Spellthief. Presumbly the Favored Soul should be on that list, but under its spell description it makes no mention of learning spells beyond replacing old known spells with new spells every X level like a Sorcerer. This is the issue I have in general with the feat and spell section, a lack of percision in the writting. Learn can be used in a very technical percise sense, and it can be used as flavor text. Sorcerers like Wizards, "learn" their spells, despite the fact the flavor of the Sorcerer is anything but scholarly. Meanwhile back at the war college, where Warmages are described as "learning" their spells they are in fact just Knowing every spell on their spell list. The Advance Learning class feature is more apply described in game terms as Expanded Spell list. To make matter worse, WOTC did a half measure when designing the Warmage. Realistically the entire concept of Spells Known, should be replaced with Only Knows and can Cast all spell on the class list. This is the wording for the Dread Necromancer. As we all know the Warmage and Beguiler have Spells known = Spell list clause. Thus when Extra Spell talks about "learning" a spell we have to ask is this technical learning or descriptive learning? Even if Extra Spell is technical learning we are still left with the problem of the Fiend Blood PrC and the Fiendish Learning ability, where it only adds to your Spells Known. "Essentially" Warmages and Beguilers still do have Spells Known, and thus would add any spell "learned" to their Spell List. Of course the poor little Sorcerer, could then "learn" say Speak with Dead, but never cast it. We also do not know if "learning" a spell in context of the Extra Spell Feat means it is added to one's class spell list. Indeed, beyond the line in Class Abillities about Bards and Sorcerers be able to "learn" spells, in the Magic section of the PHB it only refers to Bards and Sorcerers as adding to their Spells Known with level increases, never to "learning" new spells. This is a similiar mechanism that Warmages, Dread Necromancers, and Beguilers have, Warmages et all just add a lot more spells to their known spell list. Suddenly through all of the morass of the rules, I wonder if you can even talk of "learning" spells as a technical term, especially as the Favored Soul, being a divine sorcerer should then have the concept in its Spell section of Class Abilities, which it doesnt. "learning" spells is similiar to the Right of Privacy in the American Legal system, more inference than spelled out. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Beguilers & Warmages can learn any spell
Top