Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Beholder eye stalks
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ppaladin123" data-source="post: 4777652" data-attributes="member: 60923"><p>The reason is that 3.5e has no rules for targeting individual sections of monsters. It also has no rules for "temperature that melts eye-balls," and does not allow you to blind enemies with a fireball. The authors did not give any mechanical description of the beholder's eye stalks or their relative strength. There is nothing in the current rule set that allows you to say their eyes are fragile or relatively unprotected. For all we know their eye-stalks are stronger than steel and their eyes are made of invincible crystal. For the purposes of 3.5. combat statistics, they do not exist apart from the rest of the beholder.</p><p></p><p>Examine these two statements:</p><p></p><p>"It does not specifically say I can't do it, so I can."</p><p></p><p>"This is what the rules say I can do. I can only do these things unless I make a house rule to expand my options."</p><p></p><p>D&D is the second kind of game. You are trying to argue using the first statement. You say that everything that is logical in the real world should be possible. Essentially you are arguing that there is an unwritten ruleset that applies where ever logic (as you interpret it)dictates. D&D is not the real world. It is a set a rules designed to allow everyone to get together and play the game using <u>AGREEDED UPON RULES AND ABSTRACTIONS.</u> Arguments over what is logical and what is possible are exactly why the rule-set exists. We are trying to avoid the, "I shot you, you are dead. No, I am not, I dodged that because the sun was in your eye," arguments that kids have when play cowboys and indians in their backyards.</p><p></p><p>Go ahead and make a houserule about fragile eye-stacks. In your world, beholders can have fragile, easy-to-target body parts and fireballs can blind monsters. Just understand that it is your world then, not a world generated with the d&d rule set alone. You will never find rules justification for this; it is a house rule. Just make sure everyone who is playing agrees to it and agrees to all the ramifications that come from it and have fun.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ppaladin123, post: 4777652, member: 60923"] The reason is that 3.5e has no rules for targeting individual sections of monsters. It also has no rules for "temperature that melts eye-balls," and does not allow you to blind enemies with a fireball. The authors did not give any mechanical description of the beholder's eye stalks or their relative strength. There is nothing in the current rule set that allows you to say their eyes are fragile or relatively unprotected. For all we know their eye-stalks are stronger than steel and their eyes are made of invincible crystal. For the purposes of 3.5. combat statistics, they do not exist apart from the rest of the beholder. Examine these two statements: "It does not specifically say I can't do it, so I can." "This is what the rules say I can do. I can only do these things unless I make a house rule to expand my options." D&D is the second kind of game. You are trying to argue using the first statement. You say that everything that is logical in the real world should be possible. Essentially you are arguing that there is an unwritten ruleset that applies where ever logic (as you interpret it)dictates. D&D is not the real world. It is a set a rules designed to allow everyone to get together and play the game using [U]AGREEDED UPON RULES AND ABSTRACTIONS.[/U] Arguments over what is logical and what is possible are exactly why the rule-set exists. We are trying to avoid the, "I shot you, you are dead. No, I am not, I dodged that because the sun was in your eye," arguments that kids have when play cowboys and indians in their backyards. Go ahead and make a houserule about fragile eye-stacks. In your world, beholders can have fragile, easy-to-target body parts and fireballs can blind monsters. Just understand that it is your world then, not a world generated with the d&d rule set alone. You will never find rules justification for this; it is a house rule. Just make sure everyone who is playing agrees to it and agrees to all the ramifications that come from it and have fun. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Beholder eye stalks
Top