Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Being non-judgmental about play styles
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OnlineDM" data-source="post: 5586622" data-attributes="member: 90804"><p>Thanks, [MENTION=13650]AeroDm[/MENTION] - you put it pretty well. I don't want characters to suck, but I don't want characters to outshine one another too much. There's a certain power level that I tend to like in my own characters, and when I see other players building characters that I feel are significantly above that power level I tend to feel like they're all about power and not at all about character. </p><p></p><p>I'm doing it right, and everyone who loads up on power beyond that level is doing it wrong. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile :-)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" /></p><p></p><p>The odd thing is that I don't look down on players who build characters significantly below that power level; I might offer to help them, or I might try to tone things down in my own character so that the others get to shine, too, but I don't feel like they're doing it wrong.</p><p></p><p>For instance, I've built characters in D&D 4th Edition that put an 18 in their key ability score before any racial bonus. And I've felt dirty in doing so. I understand that it's optimal for a lot of classes (the Hunter and the Thief, for instance, really have no reason not to max out their Dexterity), but it feels... wrong somehow. </p><p></p><p>Perhaps I value balance... yes, I think that's probably it. A character that's optimized just around combat is unbalanced in and of itself. If that character tries to do anything other than their one big thing, they're going to be pretty lousy at it. Of course, in a well-balanced party that's okay - the other characters pick up the slack in those other areas. I still feel judgmental toward those optimized characters despite myself, though. </p><p></p><p>Anyway, I feel like I've gotten some useful perspectives on this question now. In the end it's largely a question of putting the right groups together. If you've got an optimizer, make sure they're in a group with other optimizers. If you've got players who don't focus on building optimized characters, make sure they're in a group with one another. Mixing them... well, it's probably best not to if it can be avoided.</p><p></p><p>As for me, I'll adapt to my group. If I'm playing with optimizers, I'll join them in the min-maxing. If not, I'll play to the style I prefer. Unfortunately, I know that I'll be in some mixed groups, and I'll muddle through as best I can.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OnlineDM, post: 5586622, member: 90804"] Thanks, [MENTION=13650]AeroDm[/MENTION] - you put it pretty well. I don't want characters to suck, but I don't want characters to outshine one another too much. There's a certain power level that I tend to like in my own characters, and when I see other players building characters that I feel are significantly above that power level I tend to feel like they're all about power and not at all about character. I'm doing it right, and everyone who loads up on power beyond that level is doing it wrong. :-) The odd thing is that I don't look down on players who build characters significantly below that power level; I might offer to help them, or I might try to tone things down in my own character so that the others get to shine, too, but I don't feel like they're doing it wrong. For instance, I've built characters in D&D 4th Edition that put an 18 in their key ability score before any racial bonus. And I've felt dirty in doing so. I understand that it's optimal for a lot of classes (the Hunter and the Thief, for instance, really have no reason not to max out their Dexterity), but it feels... wrong somehow. Perhaps I value balance... yes, I think that's probably it. A character that's optimized just around combat is unbalanced in and of itself. If that character tries to do anything other than their one big thing, they're going to be pretty lousy at it. Of course, in a well-balanced party that's okay - the other characters pick up the slack in those other areas. I still feel judgmental toward those optimized characters despite myself, though. Anyway, I feel like I've gotten some useful perspectives on this question now. In the end it's largely a question of putting the right groups together. If you've got an optimizer, make sure they're in a group with other optimizers. If you've got players who don't focus on building optimized characters, make sure they're in a group with one another. Mixing them... well, it's probably best not to if it can be avoided. As for me, I'll adapt to my group. If I'm playing with optimizers, I'll join them in the min-maxing. If not, I'll play to the style I prefer. Unfortunately, I know that I'll be in some mixed groups, and I'll muddle through as best I can. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Being non-judgmental about play styles
Top