Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Being non-judgmental about play styles
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OnlineDM" data-source="post: 5590881" data-attributes="member: 90804"><p>Thanks for the follow-up posts, all. I've definitely been thinking about this issue a lot lately, and I feel like I'm making progress.</p><p></p><p>To be clear, it's definitely about the power gamer play style for me and not about the individual player. The main power gamer I interact with is an awesome guy and I really enjoy hanging out with him, even gaming with him. I've just found myself rolling my eyes (privately) at his tweaked-out-for-maximum-combat-effectiveness characters. There's no real character to them, just a combination of powers and stat choices and feats that result in ultimate destruction to bad guys.</p><p></p><p>Yes, I get that this makes sense in-character; if the character were a real person whose job was going into dangerous dungeons and fighting horrible monsters, of COURSE he would want to make sure he was as effective as possible at killing those monsters without getting killed himself! It's just boring to me.</p><p></p><p>[MENTION=85555]Bedrockgames[/MENTION] hit two points that I think are dead-on. I disapprove of characters making choices that require metagame knowledge, and I disapprove of characters making choices of mechanics that are clearly weird corner cases of the rules that technically work in a powerful way but that weren't "intended" to work together in that way. If the player has to say, "Technically, this works..." then it's probably a choice I'm going to sigh about. The third point about optimizers being overly aggressive about "their play style is the only way" hasn't been a problem for me, but I can see how it could come up depending on the player.</p><p></p><p>Ultimately, I think I've come to understand the power gamer mindset a little better, and I've come to understand where my own negative feelings toward the power gamer come from. So, mission mostly accomplished! I do still feel (rightly so, I think) that <a href="http://onlinedm.wordpress.com/2010/08/23/balanced-power-parties-are-ideal/" target="_blank">balanced-power parties are ideal</a>. Power gamers should play with other power gamers, and mixing power gamers with players who have different focuses but who still care about being effective in combat is not going to work well. But I can at least respect power gamers a little more now, even if I think they should mostly play amongst themselves rather than at the same table as non-power gamers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OnlineDM, post: 5590881, member: 90804"] Thanks for the follow-up posts, all. I've definitely been thinking about this issue a lot lately, and I feel like I'm making progress. To be clear, it's definitely about the power gamer play style for me and not about the individual player. The main power gamer I interact with is an awesome guy and I really enjoy hanging out with him, even gaming with him. I've just found myself rolling my eyes (privately) at his tweaked-out-for-maximum-combat-effectiveness characters. There's no real character to them, just a combination of powers and stat choices and feats that result in ultimate destruction to bad guys. Yes, I get that this makes sense in-character; if the character were a real person whose job was going into dangerous dungeons and fighting horrible monsters, of COURSE he would want to make sure he was as effective as possible at killing those monsters without getting killed himself! It's just boring to me. [MENTION=85555]Bedrockgames[/MENTION] hit two points that I think are dead-on. I disapprove of characters making choices that require metagame knowledge, and I disapprove of characters making choices of mechanics that are clearly weird corner cases of the rules that technically work in a powerful way but that weren't "intended" to work together in that way. If the player has to say, "Technically, this works..." then it's probably a choice I'm going to sigh about. The third point about optimizers being overly aggressive about "their play style is the only way" hasn't been a problem for me, but I can see how it could come up depending on the player. Ultimately, I think I've come to understand the power gamer mindset a little better, and I've come to understand where my own negative feelings toward the power gamer come from. So, mission mostly accomplished! I do still feel (rightly so, I think) that [URL="http://onlinedm.wordpress.com/2010/08/23/balanced-power-parties-are-ideal/"]balanced-power parties are ideal[/URL]. Power gamers should play with other power gamers, and mixing power gamers with players who have different focuses but who still care about being effective in combat is not going to work well. But I can at least respect power gamers a little more now, even if I think they should mostly play amongst themselves rather than at the same table as non-power gamers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Being non-judgmental about play styles
Top