Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="malcolm_n" data-source="post: 5218420" data-attributes="member: 63154">So then, from the sound of it, and I think I like this, the monk would have a choice between making an unarmed strike with +2 prof and 1d6 damage that counts as a mace or making a monk unarmed strike with +3 prof and 1d8 (1d10 with a feat) that doesn't count as anything.&nbsp; It's a good option, and I'd probably just make my player declare which he was using before attacking in case it mattered.&nbsp; A lot of the fighter powers add Con to damage, so it's very likely a high Con character (Goliath, dwarf) might choose one most of the time (the eternal defender ED would bring the damage with the belt to 1d8 since it would count as a large mace), whereas characters with moderate or low Con would be better off going without.As a side note, it would be really cool if they'd make monk feats like this.&nbsp; They could make one for axes and one for light blades, and the monk could be a potential mc for more classes than it is now.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="malcolm_n, post: 5218420, member: 63154"] So then, from the sound of it, and I think I like this, the monk would have a choice between making an unarmed strike with +2 prof and 1d6 damage that counts as a mace or making a monk unarmed strike with +3 prof and 1d8 (1d10 with a feat) that doesn't count as anything. It's a good option, and I'd probably just make my player declare which he was using before attacking in case it mattered. A lot of the fighter powers add Con to damage, so it's very likely a high Con character (Goliath, dwarf) might choose one most of the time (the eternal defender ED would bring the damage with the belt to 1d8 since it would count as a large mace), whereas characters with moderate or low Con would be better off going without. As a side note, it would be really cool if they'd make monk feats like this. They could make one for axes and one for light blades, and the monk could be a potential mc for more classes than it is now. [/QUOTE]

Verification