Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Ben Riggs' "What the Heck Happened with 4th Edition?" seminar at Gen Con 2023
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kannik" data-source="post: 9100816" data-attributes="member: 984"><p>I think what happened (and still happens) is that often the conversations do not begin with "4e does some things that bumps against my personal playstyle," but instead begins with "4e is objectively terrible because..." or "4e breaks reality/verisimilitude because..." (sometimes written in a mocking tone) or "4e doesn't allow for fiction because..." type statements that belie the 'fact' that many people did (and still do) just fine with and had no problems with how 4e is set up and maintained a rich, vibrant, fiction-filled, game and campaign where the mechanics did not break their immersion or joy. Plus there's that (A)D&D has always contained many elements that are verisimilitude breaking should you examine them for more than a few moments -- but as someone pointed out upthread, these are so deeply rooted in the (A)D&D history (and that many people started using/playing with when they were very young/less critical) that they've internalized them and don't notice them. (And, as a second layer, might not know how to react when the curtain is pulled back to reveal them.) </p><p></p><p>Historically, there were also "You can't roleplay in 4e..." or "4e is not D&D" type assertions thrown around. (Though not that I've seen in this thread.) With the implication that those who enjoyed 4e were therefore inferior, 'stupid', and to be excluded, and that's going to hurt. Add to it that, given that counter-examples can be readily given, these 'criticisms', mockery, and rejection can feel most unfair. </p><p></p><p>And so when an edition that has been out of print for nearly a decade and should be off everyone's radar receives new and vigorous reiterations of these old saws, with the same type of "4e IS..." type entry points rather than "I couldn't get into 4e" (or just silence, since it wasn't their thing and so they just moved on), I think it's not entirely a surprise that hackles (can) get raised.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kannik, post: 9100816, member: 984"] I think what happened (and still happens) is that often the conversations do not begin with "4e does some things that bumps against my personal playstyle," but instead begins with "4e is objectively terrible because..." or "4e breaks reality/verisimilitude because..." (sometimes written in a mocking tone) or "4e doesn't allow for fiction because..." type statements that belie the 'fact' that many people did (and still do) just fine with and had no problems with how 4e is set up and maintained a rich, vibrant, fiction-filled, game and campaign where the mechanics did not break their immersion or joy. Plus there's that (A)D&D has always contained many elements that are verisimilitude breaking should you examine them for more than a few moments -- but as someone pointed out upthread, these are so deeply rooted in the (A)D&D history (and that many people started using/playing with when they were very young/less critical) that they've internalized them and don't notice them. (And, as a second layer, might not know how to react when the curtain is pulled back to reveal them.) Historically, there were also "You can't roleplay in 4e..." or "4e is not D&D" type assertions thrown around. (Though not that I've seen in this thread.) With the implication that those who enjoyed 4e were therefore inferior, 'stupid', and to be excluded, and that's going to hurt. Add to it that, given that counter-examples can be readily given, these 'criticisms', mockery, and rejection can feel most unfair. And so when an edition that has been out of print for nearly a decade and should be off everyone's radar receives new and vigorous reiterations of these old saws, with the same type of "4e IS..." type entry points rather than "I couldn't get into 4e" (or just silence, since it wasn't their thing and so they just moved on), I think it's not entirely a surprise that hackles (can) get raised. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Ben Riggs' "What the Heck Happened with 4th Edition?" seminar at Gen Con 2023
Top