Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Zeromaru X" data-source="post: 9109478" data-attributes="member: 65487">I once had a very d*ck DM, that even denied his players to do actions that did not favored the story he wanted to tell. Heck, he even invalidated nat 20s if it suit him. His excuse? He was the DM, so he can do it because reasons.So, you may think that 4e rules invalidated the DM, but as I see it, it put reins to dictator DMs that abused of their "authority". Also, Mearls was just pandering to the grognards that were playing Pathfinder, trying to lure them back to D&D by giving them what they wanted: the current, flawed 5e rules that they are trying to fix with the 2024 re-releases (and if they are trying to fix them, it means they are failed).Because, yes, there is always another side for every coin.</blockquote>