Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Ben Riggs' "What the Heck Happened with 4th Edition?" seminar at Gen Con 2023
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kannik" data-source="post: 9214599" data-attributes="member: 984"><p>I'm not sure I get what you're describing by "action complete skill system", or what aspects of D&D skill systems are lacking, irrespective of Skill Challenges. 4e has a list of skills covering adventuring (including those required to break into a castle), and lists some rules for specific uses of them, same as with the prior and succeeding editions. This sounds like you're not happy with the D&D skill system as a whole. What would you consider an action complete skill system? (I am genuinely curious.) One that lists every possible use for each skill (and no other uses are available), with equally specifically quantified outcomes for each result?</p><p></p><p>As for SC's, they're not intended to be run in a vacuum as a series of blank skill checks where a PC can roll whatever they choose. Those skill rolls function the same as any other skill roll -- there's a situation, and the player says what action they're taking, and the DM may call for a skill test, and there's a success or failure. If the action is not possible, or wouldn't help the task at hand, then the DM will likely not allow or count it, or ask for further clarification.</p><p></p><p>Given their mushy introduction, I could see cases of SC's being used situations that are not quite appropriate or what they were likely intended for. Single-point-of-success/failure tasks or even single-path tasks would not be not be a great use case. Using the example above of getting into the castle, a path could be sneak/climb over walls, another path could be bluff guards/walk in, another path could be swim moat/open locks on underwater gate/swim some more; those I wouldn't use an SC for. Something more dynamic and or extended, such as a chase, dealing with a crowd, stopping mind controlled villagers from walking into the nearby lake, perilous journeys, work much better under the SC guidelines. </p><p></p><p></p><p>The first part of this does sound like a typical (D&D included) skill system: PC has a goal, there's a number of ways they can achieve it so they describe what they do, which (likely) equals a skill test, which creates a result, play continues. Are you more in favor of a PbtA type game, with a limited set of specific moves that begin with "when you do X"?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kannik, post: 9214599, member: 984"] I'm not sure I get what you're describing by "action complete skill system", or what aspects of D&D skill systems are lacking, irrespective of Skill Challenges. 4e has a list of skills covering adventuring (including those required to break into a castle), and lists some rules for specific uses of them, same as with the prior and succeeding editions. This sounds like you're not happy with the D&D skill system as a whole. What would you consider an action complete skill system? (I am genuinely curious.) One that lists every possible use for each skill (and no other uses are available), with equally specifically quantified outcomes for each result? As for SC's, they're not intended to be run in a vacuum as a series of blank skill checks where a PC can roll whatever they choose. Those skill rolls function the same as any other skill roll -- there's a situation, and the player says what action they're taking, and the DM may call for a skill test, and there's a success or failure. If the action is not possible, or wouldn't help the task at hand, then the DM will likely not allow or count it, or ask for further clarification. Given their mushy introduction, I could see cases of SC's being used situations that are not quite appropriate or what they were likely intended for. Single-point-of-success/failure tasks or even single-path tasks would not be not be a great use case. Using the example above of getting into the castle, a path could be sneak/climb over walls, another path could be bluff guards/walk in, another path could be swim moat/open locks on underwater gate/swim some more; those I wouldn't use an SC for. Something more dynamic and or extended, such as a chase, dealing with a crowd, stopping mind controlled villagers from walking into the nearby lake, perilous journeys, work much better under the SC guidelines. The first part of this does sound like a typical (D&D included) skill system: PC has a goal, there's a number of ways they can achieve it so they describe what they do, which (likely) equals a skill test, which creates a result, play continues. Are you more in favor of a PbtA type game, with a limited set of specific moves that begin with "when you do X"? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Ben Riggs' "What the Heck Happened with 4th Edition?" seminar at Gen Con 2023
Top