Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Ben Riggs' "What the Heck Happened with 4th Edition?" seminar at Gen Con 2023
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Yalım" data-source="post: 9227742" data-attributes="member: 94569"><p>There's plenty of that in every edition in my experience, but I see it frequently used as the default way to knock down complaints.</p><p></p><p>In an exchange about how 4e classes feel too similar (fighter & paladin in this particular discussion), I got: "The people who repeat that line over and over did not play a lot of 4e, straight up. It's one of those internet only lines that gets regurgitated as truth even though classes played extremely differently."</p><p></p><p>In response to disliking vancian casting as default in PF2: "Only bad on the surface, focus spells and staves/wands/scrolls help mitigate the problems. Plus, once you get the game sense for it, it becomes even less punishing."</p><p></p><p>Or this bizarre exchange about disliking 4e's marking, which was described as a way to pull aggro: "There was no aggro mechanic in 4e. There was a mechanic to let defenders hit enemies that ignored them. You clearly have no experience with what you are talking about."</p><p></p><p>The conversation is usually some variation on:</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Person X writes some criticism of a game</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Person Y says "once you're good this isn't a problem" or "have you even played [game]?"</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">X say "yes"</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Y repeats that X must not be very good or X must not have actually played. Predictable internet argument occurs.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Continue until someone gives up or a moderator locks the thread.</li> </ol><p>As a person who didn't join this forum until 2010 and posted very little until 2023, it's weird to hear so many references to 4e always being disparaged and 5e never getting ragged on. My experience since I joined D&D-related social media in 2006~07-ish has been the diametric opposite. 4e fans telling me that my distastes are skill issues & constant ragging about 5e. I remember on GitP in 2014-ish there were hundreds of pages of threads making fun of 5e, with snarky thread titles like "The 15-Minute Designer Workday" and "Desperately Playing It Safe".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Yalım, post: 9227742, member: 94569"] There's plenty of that in every edition in my experience, but I see it frequently used as the default way to knock down complaints. In an exchange about how 4e classes feel too similar (fighter & paladin in this particular discussion), I got: "The people who repeat that line over and over did not play a lot of 4e, straight up. It's one of those internet only lines that gets regurgitated as truth even though classes played extremely differently." In response to disliking vancian casting as default in PF2: "Only bad on the surface, focus spells and staves/wands/scrolls help mitigate the problems. Plus, once you get the game sense for it, it becomes even less punishing." Or this bizarre exchange about disliking 4e's marking, which was described as a way to pull aggro: "There was no aggro mechanic in 4e. There was a mechanic to let defenders hit enemies that ignored them. You clearly have no experience with what you are talking about." The conversation is usually some variation on: [LIST=1] [*]Person X writes some criticism of a game [*]Person Y says "once you're good this isn't a problem" or "have you even played [game]?" [*]X say "yes" [*]Y repeats that X must not be very good or X must not have actually played. Predictable internet argument occurs. [*]Continue until someone gives up or a moderator locks the thread. [/LIST] As a person who didn't join this forum until 2010 and posted very little until 2023, it's weird to hear so many references to 4e always being disparaged and 5e never getting ragged on. My experience since I joined D&D-related social media in 2006~07-ish has been the diametric opposite. 4e fans telling me that my distastes are skill issues & constant ragging about 5e. I remember on GitP in 2014-ish there were hundreds of pages of threads making fun of 5e, with snarky thread titles like "The 15-Minute Designer Workday" and "Desperately Playing It Safe". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Ben Riggs' "What the Heck Happened with 4th Edition?" seminar at Gen Con 2023
Top