Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Zelda Themelin" data-source="post: 5908055" data-attributes="member: 167">I really like 3.5 ed warlock and book of nine swords, binder sorta (but I think it's more feat pathÖ/template than character class). I don't like magic users attacking with mundane weapons. Eldrich blast constantly csn get boring for some reason, but not for me. I even let my warlock players pick supernatural metamorphosis for eldrich blast so "magical rogue" doesn't have problems rolling badly against magic resistance or stupid checks to use their main attack. I like the fact that spell casters have about that many magical tricks. And if they want have more they can play wizards with limitations.There was also reserve spell system but that was way too uninuative and complicated. I used it too, but it was bit too wordly.I want lot of magic in my magic games, but one that breaks rules aka physics of the universe should be intended rather than accidental. Back to basic D&D I really liked my mostly morningstar wielding cleric who also had some divine given powers. But magic-user with 1 sleep spell or magic missile per day was painful. I am not bothered at all some use magic instead of (un)fair social skills.I don't play 4th edition but they did something right with at wills, but why oh why dailys. I hate 1/3/5 day limitations even in monster stat blocks. I also don't like direction of converting all magic power into money and vice verse. Pathfinder does this and 4th edition does it with rituals. Gold is not meta to me. It has in-game value. Magic economy has problems but it's not greedy pc:s or magic markets.</blockquote>

Verification