Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Enrahim" data-source="post: 9680162" data-attributes="member: 7025577">Could you please quote the part of the OP that is misinterpreted this way? I have observed that is a common misinterpretation, and have several times in this thread tried to fight against it. It keep coming up tough.I tried to make a strong distinction between the classic concept of benevolent GM and my new concept of benevolent stance and failed. I mentioned the situation where a GM is portraying a friendly NPCs as a possible example of (somewhat hampered) benevolient stance and explicitely contrasted this to GMPC. Still somehow you here claim I define benevolent GM (not stance) as running a GMPC. I really do not understand how I managed to fail so miserable at what I set out to do, and that is still the case after multiple rereads of my OP.Fully totaly and 100% agree, which have already tried to state multiple times in this thread, including the OP.Yes, that is also intended to be implied in my OP. A normal GM is doing a lot more than refereeing though.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Enrahim, post: 9680162, member: 7025577"] Could you please quote the part of the OP that is misinterpreted this way? I have observed that is a common misinterpretation, and have several times in this thread tried to fight against it. It keep coming up tough. I tried to make a strong distinction between the classic concept of benevolent GM and my new concept of benevolent [I]stance[/I] and failed. I mentioned the situation where a GM is portraying a friendly NPCs as a possible [I]example[/I] of (somewhat hampered) benevolient [I]stance[/I] and explicitely contrasted this to GMPC. Still somehow you here claim I [I]define[/I] benevolent [I]GM[/I] (not stance) as running a [I]GMPC[/I]. I really do not understand how I managed to fail so miserable at what I set out to do, and that is still the case after multiple rereads of my OP. Fully totaly and 100% agree, which have already tried to state multiple times in this thread, [I]including[/I] the OP. Yes, that is also intended to be implied in my OP. A normal GM is doing a lot more than refereeing though. [/QUOTE]

Verification