Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="delericho" data-source="post: 6772644" data-attributes="member: 22424">LMoPOotAPotAHotDQRoTfor me.&quot;Lost Mine...&quot; is the best adventure WotC have produced for some years; possibly the best D&amp;D adventure WotC have produced ever. (Though note that that's WotC, not TSR!)I consider the first half of OotA to be on a par with LMoP, or perhaps even better. Alas, I found the second half under-baked, and the climax was hugely disappointing - bad enough to ruin the whole.&quot;Princes...&quot; just didn't grab me. I don't know why. It was okay, but...And I actually rate HotDQ more highly than RoT. One of the things I like seeing in adventures is when the designers make sure to note many different ways the PCs might solve a problem. And while I found the sequence of chapters in HotDQ overly prescriptive, I did like that there were a range of options called out within most of the chapters. &quot;Rise...&quot; struck me as little more than an inferior knock-off of Dragonlance.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="delericho, post: 6772644, member: 22424"] LMoP OotA PotA HotDQ RoT for me. "Lost Mine..." is the best adventure WotC have produced for some years; possibly the best D&D adventure WotC have produced [i]ever[/i]. (Though note that that's WotC, not TSR!) I consider the first half of OotA to be on a par with LMoP, or perhaps even better. Alas, I found the second half under-baked, and the climax was hugely disappointing - bad enough to ruin the whole. "Princes..." just didn't grab me. I don't know why. It was okay, but... And I actually rate HotDQ more highly than RoT. One of the things I like seeing in adventures is when the designers make sure to note many different ways the PCs might solve a problem. And while I found the sequence of chapters in HotDQ overly prescriptive, I did like that there were a range of options called out within most of the chapters. "Rise..." struck me as little more than an inferior knock-off of Dragonlance. [/QUOTE]

Verification