Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="EyeontheMountain" data-source="post: 3247858" data-attributes="member: 32338">Best:Complete MageRed HandPHB IIOverall, Wizards did some good hings forthe D&D game this year including alterate calss features, and some good new base classes and options. Not as much as I would have hoped, given my rant below, but not bad.Not as good as I hopedFiendish Codex I and IICityscapeFR and Eberron stuffHere, these books just do not fit my bill, and thus it makes me wonder what else Wizards could have made to fit my game. I never minded too much when Wizards had one alternate campaign world getting love, but with two, a seemingly 50% of he books they come out with get an automatic pass from me. That's a lot of wasted months for my gaming dollar.And plain badTome of MagicBook of 9 swordsWeapons of LegacyMagic of IncarnumMaybe they are good books flavour-wise and mechanically, but they really push the game in a way I just do not want to go, and more annoyingly have the effect of splitting the gaming community into smaller groups. (Especially the online community whre I do most of my playing) Do you allow this/that? is bad enough with the races and completes and DMs who love/like various prestige classes, races and feats, but the above four books add whole new areas to D&D, areas that can have a profound, and poorly tested effect on the game. How does Incarnum fit into an existing gmae? It doesn't. It neds a world built around it. Same for trunamers, shadow magic, Warblades and on and on and on. I do wish wizards would stop testing out 4E ideas in 3.5 books.</blockquote>

Verification