Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Andor" data-source="post: 4384514" data-attributes="member: 1879">The other thing to look at is: What classes have obvious gaps that multiclassing can fix?The Warlord and Fighter have no ranged powers, this is an obvious weakness. The Warlock and Wizard have no melee powers, but probably don't need them except in a 'panic button' kind of way. The other thing to look at is what strengths a class has that can be complemented by some additional powers.Warlords for example are extremely good at moving their teammates around the battlefield. They have little ability to shape the field itself however, so Wizard wall and zone powers are a good match. You know from both a stat complement and a power congruity standpoint the Warlord/Wizard multiclass looks very strong. Warlord makes for a tougher base of course and then mixing in Wizard spells for battlefield shaping and ranged attacks while the Warlord positions allies and deals melee hurt and healing. Warzard ftw?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Andor, post: 4384514, member: 1879"] The other thing to look at is: What classes have obvious gaps that multiclassing can fix? The Warlord and Fighter have no ranged powers, this is an obvious weakness. The Warlock and Wizard have no melee powers, but probably don't need them except in a 'panic button' kind of way. The other thing to look at is what strengths a class has that can be complemented by some additional powers. Warlords for example are extremely good at moving their teammates around the battlefield. They have little ability to shape the field itself however, so Wizard wall and zone powers are a good match. You know from both a stat complement and a power congruity standpoint the Warlord/Wizard multiclass looks very strong. Warlord makes for a tougher base of course and then mixing in Wizard spells for battlefield shaping and ranged attacks while the Warlord positions allies and deals melee hurt and healing. Warzard ftw? [/QUOTE]

Verification