Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="7thlvlDM" data-source="post: 153428" data-attributes="member: 1081">I personally think event based adventures are fine.  The adventure model cannot be expected to have an answer for everything the PCs do.  As a DM, you should be able to impromptu what happens when an event doesn't unfold how the author of the model predicted, and make it work well!  That's part of the thrill of the big chair.Psion, no offense intended, but if you gave The Standing Stone a 2 I'm a little concerned because the vast majority of its reviewers gave it a 5.  I don't mean that you aren't entitled to your opinion, you are.  But in this case you don't represent the norm, and since you are an Official Reviewer, your opinion will carry more 'weight'.I think plot, production quality, and good rules outweigh balance and linearity, because the last two can be modified by an experienced DM to fit his PCs.  Ease of use is an issue (I'll give you that <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> ) but going from Excellent to Poor because of this one criteria is a little harsh, IMO.-7th</blockquote>