Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Best Non-Core Monster Books
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Desdichado" data-source="post: 5725091" data-attributes="member: 2205"><p>I'm not quite sure what you mean by core. That word became a bit of a loaded word when 4e declared that <em>everything</em> was core. By the same token, is an older edition (or Pathfinder) basic Monster Manual or Bestiary 1 core but 2 (or higher) not? I think that's a problematic designation.</p><p></p><p>Personally, I get the most use out of the SRD. Even though I prefer to use <em>d20 Past</em> as my rulebase rather than 3.5, I turn to the 3.5 SRD (or Monster Manual) more often than I turn to the <em>d20 Modern</em> or <em>Menace Manual</em> books.</p><p></p><p>Most used aside, my favorite monster books are the two <em>Monsternomicons</em> by Privateer Press. There are a few guys in there that are Iron Kingdoms specific, but not many. And frankly, even those that are are really cool. I find these books incredibly fun just to read, and I think their take on the concept of some of the humanoids is just plain better than anything D&D has done officially. In fact, I've pretty much decided a long time ago that the description of the Skorne empire is what hobgoblins <em>should</em> be, and for that matter, I'm really starting to lean towards using either the tharn or the trollkin (or both) as what the concept of orcs <em>should</em> be. I also completely <em>love</em> the idea of dragons in the Monsternomicons.</p><p></p><p>For those of the rest of you who are fans; I never updated my first Monsternomicon from the 3e version to the 3.5 version. Is there any value in me doing so, or does it just change a few stats and CRs and otherwise provide all the same content? I don't have any problem using them as is, though. I can convert skill on the fly, and I only ever used CR as a very rough gauge of challenge anyway.</p><p></p><p>That's curious. I found that they mostly further entrenched the already pretty bog-standard D&D interpretation of the monsters and rarely put fresh or weird twists on much of anything. In fact, I had <em>hoped</em> that they would put more of a fresh twist on these monsters, thus justifying the "revisited" notion implied by the title, but was rather disappointed to find them rarely actually revisisted and rather simply restated and reprinted in mostly the same format and conception that we've always had. Not that they're not a decent series of books, but it really wasn't what it was advertised to be, at least not in my opinion. The best of the bunch, IMO, is <em>Classic Horrors Revisited</em>, but that may be because I just like horror tropes quite a bit. The classic horrors were presented very classically--not exactly revisisted.</p><p></p><p>Other monster books that I've really enjoyed reading weren't the typical monster catalog books; stuff like the 3.5 era <em>Drow of the Underdark</em> or <em>Lords of Madness</em>. The <em>Draconomicon</em> was quite good, but sadly always makes me wish that it was as cool as the relatively much briefer description of dragons in <em>Monsternomicon</em>. <em>Liber Mortis</em>, on the other hand, I found quite disappointing. <em>Fiendish Codex I: Hordes of the Abyss</em> was probably my favorite of this series. Brilliant and classic at the same time. The other <em>Fiendish Codex II: Tyrants of the Nine Hells</em> had some interesting material, but the extended in-joke or metaphor (I'm not sure which) of hell as fantasy <em>Office Space</em> didn't really work for me after a while.</p><p></p><p>The monster book after that which is most likely to be used and read here and there in my house is Green Ronin's <em>Book of Fiends</em>. There's a lot of really nasty critters in there, and a lot of stuff that's just kind of fun to read about and then cackle while petting my cat in an evil GM Overlord kind of fashion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Desdichado, post: 5725091, member: 2205"] I'm not quite sure what you mean by core. That word became a bit of a loaded word when 4e declared that [I]everything[/I] was core. By the same token, is an older edition (or Pathfinder) basic Monster Manual or Bestiary 1 core but 2 (or higher) not? I think that's a problematic designation. Personally, I get the most use out of the SRD. Even though I prefer to use [I]d20 Past[/I] as my rulebase rather than 3.5, I turn to the 3.5 SRD (or Monster Manual) more often than I turn to the [I]d20 Modern[/I] or [I]Menace Manual[/I] books. Most used aside, my favorite monster books are the two [I]Monsternomicons[/I] by Privateer Press. There are a few guys in there that are Iron Kingdoms specific, but not many. And frankly, even those that are are really cool. I find these books incredibly fun just to read, and I think their take on the concept of some of the humanoids is just plain better than anything D&D has done officially. In fact, I've pretty much decided a long time ago that the description of the Skorne empire is what hobgoblins [I]should[/I] be, and for that matter, I'm really starting to lean towards using either the tharn or the trollkin (or both) as what the concept of orcs [I]should[/I] be. I also completely [I]love[/I] the idea of dragons in the Monsternomicons. For those of the rest of you who are fans; I never updated my first Monsternomicon from the 3e version to the 3.5 version. Is there any value in me doing so, or does it just change a few stats and CRs and otherwise provide all the same content? I don't have any problem using them as is, though. I can convert skill on the fly, and I only ever used CR as a very rough gauge of challenge anyway. That's curious. I found that they mostly further entrenched the already pretty bog-standard D&D interpretation of the monsters and rarely put fresh or weird twists on much of anything. In fact, I had [I]hoped[/I] that they would put more of a fresh twist on these monsters, thus justifying the "revisited" notion implied by the title, but was rather disappointed to find them rarely actually revisisted and rather simply restated and reprinted in mostly the same format and conception that we've always had. Not that they're not a decent series of books, but it really wasn't what it was advertised to be, at least not in my opinion. The best of the bunch, IMO, is [I]Classic Horrors Revisited[/I], but that may be because I just like horror tropes quite a bit. The classic horrors were presented very classically--not exactly revisisted. Other monster books that I've really enjoyed reading weren't the typical monster catalog books; stuff like the 3.5 era [I]Drow of the Underdark[/I] or [I]Lords of Madness[/I]. The [I]Draconomicon[/I] was quite good, but sadly always makes me wish that it was as cool as the relatively much briefer description of dragons in [I]Monsternomicon[/I]. [I]Liber Mortis[/I], on the other hand, I found quite disappointing. [I]Fiendish Codex I: Hordes of the Abyss[/I] was probably my favorite of this series. Brilliant and classic at the same time. The other [I]Fiendish Codex II: Tyrants of the Nine Hells[/I] had some interesting material, but the extended in-joke or metaphor (I'm not sure which) of hell as fantasy [I]Office Space[/I] didn't really work for me after a while. The monster book after that which is most likely to be used and read here and there in my house is Green Ronin's [I]Book of Fiends[/I]. There's a lot of really nasty critters in there, and a lot of stuff that's just kind of fun to read about and then cackle while petting my cat in an evil GM Overlord kind of fashion. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Best Non-Core Monster Books
Top