Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Best Practices for running single-player (or two-player) campaigns
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="athos" data-source="post: 5383813" data-attributes="member: 32605"><p>If you like going solo, just disregard this first idea... but, have you thought about moving your game to online. I have a friend that was playing solo and they were getting burned out on just the two of them, so they moved to openRPG and skype, so that more people could get in on the action. Next thing you know, there were 7 in the group.</p><p> </p><p>Next, do you play more sandbox style or scripted? If you have a premade city, the old JG citystates come to mind, then you could let the player wonder around and kind of "choose" what he wants to do. This is a more advanced option where the DM has to be ready for just about anything. A classical dungeon crawl kind of assumes that the 4 archetypes will be represented in some way or other, so that would be kind of difficult, IMO, to pull off.</p><p> </p><p>Other adventures would depend strongly on class, but I do like the option someone made of giving the leadership feat for free, so he can have a cohort at least. NWN was like this, and it was quite fun for a computer game. This would at least give you two of the four archetypes, and depending on your classes, you could perhaps summon cannon fodder.</p><p> </p><p>Rogues would seem to be the easiest class to run solo. They could be part of a thieves guild where they are sent out on assignments and given resources (like muscle) when they need it. Other classes could be part of a guild as well, you will just have to be creative.</p><p> </p><p>I grew up in a small rural town, so I played a lot of times with just one and two players and I DM'd. I liked the sandbox approach where I would try and let the party pick out what they wanted to do, so as not to get the feel that I was railroading them all the time. This was great for more experienced players, but people new to the game need more structure, for them I would use the "assignment" method and tailor adventures to them, and let them move up in the guild as they moved up in level.</p><p> </p><p>Best of luck to your game,</p><p> </p><p>Athos</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="athos, post: 5383813, member: 32605"] If you like going solo, just disregard this first idea... but, have you thought about moving your game to online. I have a friend that was playing solo and they were getting burned out on just the two of them, so they moved to openRPG and skype, so that more people could get in on the action. Next thing you know, there were 7 in the group. Next, do you play more sandbox style or scripted? If you have a premade city, the old JG citystates come to mind, then you could let the player wonder around and kind of "choose" what he wants to do. This is a more advanced option where the DM has to be ready for just about anything. A classical dungeon crawl kind of assumes that the 4 archetypes will be represented in some way or other, so that would be kind of difficult, IMO, to pull off. Other adventures would depend strongly on class, but I do like the option someone made of giving the leadership feat for free, so he can have a cohort at least. NWN was like this, and it was quite fun for a computer game. This would at least give you two of the four archetypes, and depending on your classes, you could perhaps summon cannon fodder. Rogues would seem to be the easiest class to run solo. They could be part of a thieves guild where they are sent out on assignments and given resources (like muscle) when they need it. Other classes could be part of a guild as well, you will just have to be creative. I grew up in a small rural town, so I played a lot of times with just one and two players and I DM'd. I liked the sandbox approach where I would try and let the party pick out what they wanted to do, so as not to get the feel that I was railroading them all the time. This was great for more experienced players, but people new to the game need more structure, for them I would use the "assignment" method and tailor adventures to them, and let them move up in the guild as they moved up in level. Best of luck to your game, Athos [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Best Practices for running single-player (or two-player) campaigns
Top