Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Best...Puzzle...Ever....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sagiro" data-source="post: 1353769" data-attributes="member: 726"><p>Ranger, orsal's explanation is correct, and he said it better than I was saying it.</p><p></p><p>As to the riddle generally, here's my take:</p><p></p><p>[spoiler]The way the original riddle in this thread is phrased is a very simple (yet obviously counterintuitive) example of conditional probability. As stated, it presents you only with these facts:</p><p></p><p>1. There are two children</p><p>2. At least one of them is a boy.</p><p></p><p>That's it. That's all we know. While we know there <strong>is</strong> an ordering to these children, we don't know anything <strong>about</strong> that ordering. The boy could have been the first kid or the second kid, but we don't know which. </p><p></p><p>The riddle is the same as if we said: "A woman has flipped two coins. They've already landed but you're not allowed to look at them. Then you find out that at least one coin landed heads. Now, what are the odds that the other one is a tail?"</p><p></p><p>I think all mathematically-inclined people here know that if you flip two coins, there are four equally-likely outcomes:</p><p></p><p>1. HH</p><p>2. TH</p><p>3. HT</p><p>4. TT</p><p></p><p>If someone now tells you that at least one coin came up heads, the <strong>only</strong> effect that has on the problem is that you can now eliminate "TT" as a possibility. It doesn't make any of the remaining three outcomes any more or less likely. (And of specific import, it doesn't make the HH outcome any more likely.) That leaves three equally-likely possibilities:</p><p></p><p>1. HH</p><p>2. TH</p><p>3. HT</p><p></p><p>Now you're allowed to look at the coins. </p><p></p><p>If it turned out that the result was #1, then if you look at a coin that is heads, the other one is heads.</p><p></p><p>If it turned out that the result was #2, then if you look at a coin that is heads, the other one is tails.</p><p></p><p>If it turned out that the result was #3, then if you look at a coin that is heads, the other one is tails.</p><p></p><p>Thus, in two out of the three cases, the other coin is a tails, or a girl in the original riddle.[/spoiler]</p><p></p><p>-Sagiro</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sagiro, post: 1353769, member: 726"] Ranger, orsal's explanation is correct, and he said it better than I was saying it. As to the riddle generally, here's my take: [spoiler]The way the original riddle in this thread is phrased is a very simple (yet obviously counterintuitive) example of conditional probability. As stated, it presents you only with these facts: 1. There are two children 2. At least one of them is a boy. That's it. That's all we know. While we know there [b]is[/b] an ordering to these children, we don't know anything [b]about[/b] that ordering. The boy could have been the first kid or the second kid, but we don't know which. The riddle is the same as if we said: "A woman has flipped two coins. They've already landed but you're not allowed to look at them. Then you find out that at least one coin landed heads. Now, what are the odds that the other one is a tail?" I think all mathematically-inclined people here know that if you flip two coins, there are four equally-likely outcomes: 1. HH 2. TH 3. HT 4. TT If someone now tells you that at least one coin came up heads, the [b]only[/b] effect that has on the problem is that you can now eliminate "TT" as a possibility. It doesn't make any of the remaining three outcomes any more or less likely. (And of specific import, it doesn't make the HH outcome any more likely.) That leaves three equally-likely possibilities: 1. HH 2. TH 3. HT Now you're allowed to look at the coins. If it turned out that the result was #1, then if you look at a coin that is heads, the other one is heads. If it turned out that the result was #2, then if you look at a coin that is heads, the other one is tails. If it turned out that the result was #3, then if you look at a coin that is heads, the other one is tails. Thus, in two out of the three cases, the other coin is a tails, or a girl in the original riddle.[/spoiler] -Sagiro [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Best...Puzzle...Ever....
Top