Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="WizarDru" data-source="post: 1055772" data-attributes="member: 151">Re: Seeing as...That's a darn fine question.  Truthfully?  It depends.  I consider DS9 a near miss.  I thought it had moments that were nothing short of brilliance and quality-wise, I think it was better, on average, than ST:TNG.  But somewhere along the line, I got Star Trek fatigue.  That may not be DS9's fault, but I grew tired of the reliance on technobabble engineering saving the day and the many other tropes of DS9.  I enjoyed many aspects of the show, such as the character of Garrick, who immediately raised the quality of any episode he was in, for example.  I thought that the first two seasons were an interesting allegory and that they were really balancing on a wire.  And then they sort of fell off it, for me.  I dropped out for a while, and then when I returned, I learn of some changes that just seemed so silly that I wasn't interested (ex: Bashir's really a super-genius, and he's just been pretending to be dumb all this time).  I took the announcement of the addition of Worf to the cast as a 'jumping the shark', regardless of whether it was or not.As for SG-1, I didn't list that because I simply haven't seen enough of it to make a judgement.  The episodes I've seen are great, but I just haven't had time to watch it.I didn't mention Jeremiah, even though I think it's a great show, mostly because it's very uneven...and judging from JMS recent comments, MGM is probably a large part of that problem.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown    :("  data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" /></blockquote>

Verification