Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Best Spell to Maximize
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jeremy" data-source="post: 226377" data-attributes="member: 4036"><p>Flame flame everywhere....</p><p></p><p>Hang on a second, lemme go get my Frosty.</p><p></p><p>To the no multi empowers and no cleaves there are numerous rules reasons why the rules say what they say, none of which will convince you because you've locked on to your once phrase in the book that you are going to take literally above all others.</p><p></p><p>That's ok, that's how arguments on this board normally turn out.</p><p></p><p>There is one non-rules point that should make a minor difference to you even if it doesn't sway you.</p><p></p><p>There are numerous people, myself and my group included, that have always thought that it was ruled this way, and when the sage confirmed it we just nodded and kept playing. It had seemed simple to us from the text---(That's one reason, that so many people read it that way BEFORE the sage said anything). And it has not unbalanced gameplay. Cleave and Great Cleave are still somewhat relegated to large strong creatures with reach for it's usefulness and empower spell still doesn't see much use because at 2 and 4 and 6 levels higher than your original spell, you'll find other spell that are incredibly useful. Why do a double empowered cure moderate when you can do a heal?---(That's the second reason, we've been playing it like this since 3e playtest before the PHB came out and it works fine, so it can't be as gamebreaking as you are saying.)</p><p></p><p>So please, either try it and tell us of how it broke your game, or stop bashing it and simply state that in your games you don't want to run it that way. Either one is more convincing and less offensive then saying "You all who play it like that way are breaking the game and are all powergamers" because some of us don't feel like powergames and feel it insulting to be called such, and some of us don't feel like our games are broken in any way shape or form.</p><p></p><p>As we are the ones playing with these rules in effect, we are in a much better situation to judge whether or not they are broken then you can by sitting down and thinking of it in theory. In theory there are a lot of things that would seem to be a lot more powerful than they are.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jeremy, post: 226377, member: 4036"] Flame flame everywhere.... Hang on a second, lemme go get my Frosty. To the no multi empowers and no cleaves there are numerous rules reasons why the rules say what they say, none of which will convince you because you've locked on to your once phrase in the book that you are going to take literally above all others. That's ok, that's how arguments on this board normally turn out. There is one non-rules point that should make a minor difference to you even if it doesn't sway you. There are numerous people, myself and my group included, that have always thought that it was ruled this way, and when the sage confirmed it we just nodded and kept playing. It had seemed simple to us from the text---(That's one reason, that so many people read it that way BEFORE the sage said anything). And it has not unbalanced gameplay. Cleave and Great Cleave are still somewhat relegated to large strong creatures with reach for it's usefulness and empower spell still doesn't see much use because at 2 and 4 and 6 levels higher than your original spell, you'll find other spell that are incredibly useful. Why do a double empowered cure moderate when you can do a heal?---(That's the second reason, we've been playing it like this since 3e playtest before the PHB came out and it works fine, so it can't be as gamebreaking as you are saying.) So please, either try it and tell us of how it broke your game, or stop bashing it and simply state that in your games you don't want to run it that way. Either one is more convincing and less offensive then saying "You all who play it like that way are breaking the game and are all powergamers" because some of us don't feel like powergames and feel it insulting to be called such, and some of us don't feel like our games are broken in any way shape or form. As we are the ones playing with these rules in effect, we are in a much better situation to judge whether or not they are broken then you can by sitting down and thinking of it in theory. In theory there are a lot of things that would seem to be a lot more powerful than they are. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Best Spell to Maximize
Top