Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Best way to implement these in strict 3.5 rules?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="swrushing" data-source="post: 1667451" data-attributes="member: 14140"><p></p></blockquote><p></p><p></p><p>With DND you can simply describe the spell efects to be whatever you like. There is no "build" like in HERo, so pretty much just jot down what you want, put in the relevent specs and go from there. </p><p></p><p>Off hand, i would say close range or medium, duration in hours, probably VSM, the target held "helpless" while the spell is in effect and the caster can leave him at slow spin or he can speed him up. I would let the damage be con damage as thats relatively constant compared to HP. Give the victim a save or not depending on how high a level you want the spell to be. But a lethal spell on a failed save is probably 7th or better.</p><p></p><p></p><p>This is where you probably would get into trouble.</p><p></p><p>OK see, now you are talking realistic effects.</p><p></p><p>Most people will be killed by a few run throughs by a sword.</p><p>Most people would be incinerated, or at least incapacitated and blinded, by a fiery dragons breath.</p><p>Most people would be crushed by a giant's rock.</p><p>Most people would not be able to do most of what epic fantasy heroes do and what the DND system allows.</p><p></p><p>The sap already exists in DND. it like the other weapons has a designed and consistent effect.</p><p></p><p>If in your module you change how the sap works, giving it quick Ko options that get around hit points that it did not otherwise have, you change "the way normal things work" for your module and that will cause problems. Its perfectly fine to have a strange new magic feidl do all sorts of wondrous things or a new monster with bizarre new features as these represent "unusual things" but not to change the basic normal everyday things.</p><p></p><p>So, no more than a quick hit with a longsword is dangerous to a 10th or even 3rd level fighter (it has to work thru a lot of hit points), a few quick hits from a sap wont be either.</p><p></p><p>Now, some exceptions would be to have the footpads be rogues, so their sneak attack might get the sap damage up to knockout level, but unless you give them a lot of levels (more than the notion of simple footpads, perhaps), that wont happen reliably, in DND. The combat system is specifically designed to not allow "realistic quick drops" of heroes.</p><p></p><p>After all, whats to stop the 10th level rogue from slipping in with his +2 sap and KOing the giant, the lich, the troll-king or (if he has multiple attacks and is very fast) the hydra!</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="swrushing, post: 1667451, member: 14140"] [/QUOTE] With DND you can simply describe the spell efects to be whatever you like. There is no "build" like in HERo, so pretty much just jot down what you want, put in the relevent specs and go from there. Off hand, i would say close range or medium, duration in hours, probably VSM, the target held "helpless" while the spell is in effect and the caster can leave him at slow spin or he can speed him up. I would let the damage be con damage as thats relatively constant compared to HP. Give the victim a save or not depending on how high a level you want the spell to be. But a lethal spell on a failed save is probably 7th or better. This is where you probably would get into trouble. OK see, now you are talking realistic effects. Most people will be killed by a few run throughs by a sword. Most people would be incinerated, or at least incapacitated and blinded, by a fiery dragons breath. Most people would be crushed by a giant's rock. Most people would not be able to do most of what epic fantasy heroes do and what the DND system allows. The sap already exists in DND. it like the other weapons has a designed and consistent effect. If in your module you change how the sap works, giving it quick Ko options that get around hit points that it did not otherwise have, you change "the way normal things work" for your module and that will cause problems. Its perfectly fine to have a strange new magic feidl do all sorts of wondrous things or a new monster with bizarre new features as these represent "unusual things" but not to change the basic normal everyday things. So, no more than a quick hit with a longsword is dangerous to a 10th or even 3rd level fighter (it has to work thru a lot of hit points), a few quick hits from a sap wont be either. Now, some exceptions would be to have the footpads be rogues, so their sneak attack might get the sap damage up to knockout level, but unless you give them a lot of levels (more than the notion of simple footpads, perhaps), that wont happen reliably, in DND. The combat system is specifically designed to not allow "realistic quick drops" of heroes. After all, whats to stop the 10th level rogue from slipping in with his +2 sap and KOing the giant, the lich, the troll-king or (if he has multiple attacks and is very fast) the hydra! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Best way to implement these in strict 3.5 rules?
Top