Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Bhut (conversion from X4)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="King Nate" data-source="post: 4619856" data-attributes="member: 7435"><p>There are a number of reasons why I changed this around, while I am a huge fan of the recharge ability for monsters, I see it more as time spent building up to some power. For example; the time needed to create a magical effect, the time needed to build up that breath weapon, or the time needed to spot an opening for the attack. (Ok, so the bite can probably fit into that last description.) </p><p></p><p>I'll get back to this after I explain the claw attacks. </p><p></p><p>I would say roughly 90% of the non-minon monsters in the MM has <em>at least </em>one other standard at-will attack besides their basic melee attack. A lot of times it is just a double basic attack, kind of what I was doing before. </p><p></p><p>You say you don't like trick monsters, how about a monster that runs around using their basic attack, basic attack, basic attack, then BAM! a bite that dazes and weakens the character (save ends both). If I was a player I would be like WTF?! </p><p></p><p>Speaking of dazed and weakened, in my research I have only found one monster that had a single attack that both dazed and weakened their foes. It was a solo monster and the attack power was an encounter power. Not even Orcus or any of the dragons have this amazing combination in a single attack. </p><p></p><p>According to the version of the bhut that I have a bite will numb the target. I think either dazed or weaken is a fine substitute for numbing, but not both. </p><p></p><p>So back to the recharge power. I was thinking something along the lines of the bhut having to set up the bite instead of waiting for it to recharge. I might have quickly tossed my thoughts on it instead of thinking about it. After thinking about it I think it should go like this: </p><p></p><p>Instead of having the twin claw attack the bhut has;</p><p></p><p>Maul (standard; at-will)</p><p>The bhut makes two claw attacks. If both claw attacks hit the same target, the bhut makes a secondary attack against the target. Secondary Attack: +11 vs. AC; the target is grabbed (until escape).</p><p></p><p>Cold Bite (standard; at-will)</p><p>The bhut deals to a grabbed target 2d6 + 3 cold damage, and target is weakened (save ends, no attack roll required) this ends the effect of the grab. </p><p></p><p>Also in the version I have, a blessed weapon will kill a bhut, automatically. Now maybe a vulnerability of 20 is too much, but I can't see 10 being so. </p><p></p><p>Maybe a change, a critical hit from a weapon with the radiant keyword brings a bhuts hit points to 0.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="King Nate, post: 4619856, member: 7435"] There are a number of reasons why I changed this around, while I am a huge fan of the recharge ability for monsters, I see it more as time spent building up to some power. For example; the time needed to create a magical effect, the time needed to build up that breath weapon, or the time needed to spot an opening for the attack. (Ok, so the bite can probably fit into that last description.) I'll get back to this after I explain the claw attacks. I would say roughly 90% of the non-minon monsters in the MM has [I]at least [/I]one other standard at-will attack besides their basic melee attack. A lot of times it is just a double basic attack, kind of what I was doing before. You say you don't like trick monsters, how about a monster that runs around using their basic attack, basic attack, basic attack, then BAM! a bite that dazes and weakens the character (save ends both). If I was a player I would be like WTF?! Speaking of dazed and weakened, in my research I have only found one monster that had a single attack that both dazed and weakened their foes. It was a solo monster and the attack power was an encounter power. Not even Orcus or any of the dragons have this amazing combination in a single attack. According to the version of the bhut that I have a bite will numb the target. I think either dazed or weaken is a fine substitute for numbing, but not both. So back to the recharge power. I was thinking something along the lines of the bhut having to set up the bite instead of waiting for it to recharge. I might have quickly tossed my thoughts on it instead of thinking about it. After thinking about it I think it should go like this: Instead of having the twin claw attack the bhut has; Maul (standard; at-will) The bhut makes two claw attacks. If both claw attacks hit the same target, the bhut makes a secondary attack against the target. Secondary Attack: +11 vs. AC; the target is grabbed (until escape). Cold Bite (standard; at-will) The bhut deals to a grabbed target 2d6 + 3 cold damage, and target is weakened (save ends, no attack roll required) this ends the effect of the grab. Also in the version I have, a blessed weapon will kill a bhut, automatically. Now maybe a vulnerability of 20 is too much, but I can't see 10 being so. Maybe a change, a critical hit from a weapon with the radiant keyword brings a bhuts hit points to 0. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Bhut (conversion from X4)
Top