Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Belen" data-source="post: 1114907" data-attributes="member: 1405">True, but bias should be on the part of the individual and not the majority.For example, what it five different EnWorld existed.&nbsp; Each EnWorld would cater to a subset of people.&nbsp; Yeah, they may have disagreements sometimes, but they mainly agreed on all the big things and each person supported the authors arguments so you always felt good about the way you felt on a matter. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f631.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":eek:" title="Eek!&nbsp; &nbsp; :eek:"&nbsp; data-smilie="9"data-shortname=":eek:" /> Worse, what would happen if you could turn on the TV and always here your viewpoint, so that all was always right in to world.&nbsp; Eventuall, the bias that you watched initially because you agreed with it, would form your opinion period and thus what they say becomes your view on any topic that you could consider.&nbsp;&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f631.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":eek:" title="Eek!&nbsp; &nbsp; :eek:"&nbsp; data-smilie="9"data-shortname=":eek:" />&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f631.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":eek:" title="Eek!&nbsp; &nbsp; :eek:"&nbsp; data-smilie="9"data-shortname=":eek:" />&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f631.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":eek:" title="Eek!&nbsp; &nbsp; :eek:"&nbsp; data-smilie="9"data-shortname=":eek:" /> This is why I would prefer the facts for news and allow my own opinion to form.Then shoot my mouth off on the boards and have you all jump down my throat.&nbsp;&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p"&nbsp; data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /> However, I would prefer civil jumping down of the throat and constructive arguments rather than flames.&nbsp;&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> Dave</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Belen, post: 1114907, member: 1405"] True, but bias should be on the part of the individual and not the majority. For example, what it five different EnWorld existed. Each EnWorld would cater to a subset of people. Yeah, they may have disagreements sometimes, but they mainly agreed on all the big things and each person supported the authors arguments so you always felt good about the way you felt on a matter. :eek: Worse, what would happen if you could turn on the TV and always here your viewpoint, so that all was always right in to world. Eventuall, the bias that you watched initially because you agreed with it, would form your opinion period and thus what they say becomes your view on any topic that you could consider. :eek: :eek: :eek: This is why I would prefer the facts for news and allow my own opinion to form. Then shoot my mouth off on the boards and have you all jump down my throat. :p However, I would prefer civil jumping down of the throat and constructive arguments rather than flames. ;) Dave [/QUOTE]

Verification