Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Binary Success vs Multiple Levels of Success
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RenleyRenfield" data-source="post: 9632075" data-attributes="member: 7044197"><p>I think you bring up a good question that is hinted at in the whole mixed success and fail and both etc etc = </p><p></p><p><strong>What actually is <em>"Fail"</em> ?? </strong></p><p></p><p>To me... Fail means "...it didn't go as I wanted it to." </p><p>and Fumble/Botch means "....I screwed it all up and made matters worse"</p><p></p><p>However, both of those could still possibly include "I did the action I was trying to do, but...." (then append one of the results above) </p><p></p><p><strong>So Failure is always an option... it just never "Fail = nothing happens" </strong></p><p>...</p><p></p><p>What is a situation in which "Fail = nothing happens" , is <em>more fun and engaging</em> than "succeeded with complications?" </p><p></p><p>......</p><p></p><p>Note that "fail with opportunity" is really the <strong>exact same thing</strong> as "success with complications", just phrased different.... </p><p>"You failed to complete the task as you intended, but <em>you still acted</em> and did things and <em>stuff still happened</em>. It just failed to resolve as you hoped. Which could be: it worked with less effect, it costed much more, it allowed the badguy to also get a task completed, the thing didn't work but its also not busted so you can try again, you didn't see anything but nobody saw you either, etc etc... " </p><p></p><p>....</p><p></p><p></p><p>The idea behind <strong>success with complications being better than 5+tiers of success/fail and better than pass/fail </strong>= is that it is the way to acknowledge that the character in fact did act, they did something, and that failure is never just 'nothing occurred at all from your action.' </p><p> It also asks everyone to consider 'failure' is more than 'you don't it at all' = far more often 'failure' is based entirely on very different possibilities - none of which are 'nothing happens'. </p><p></p><p>A typical example of this is "Roll to climb the wall", you fail the roll, you don't climb the wall. = what a boring result</p><p>Some games go so far as to <em>punish </em>for a failed roll, "roll to climb the wall. you failed, you fall and take damage". = ok fine, but what a tedious and one-dimensional result. Every time, always 'take harm' result, bleh....</p><p></p><p>But that is far from the only result 'fail' could mean. </p><p></p><p>If we go with PBTA's dynamic of success with complications we get a better paradigm for keeping the game going and engaging players for fun. "Roll to climb the wall, you failed(Success with Complications), you made it half way up and you panic and freeze, you cant will your arms to go up or down." or "you failed(SwC), you made it up over the wall, but there were spikes at the top, and you cut yourself, take harm but you are up there", or "You failed(SwC), you can't seem to find footholds to climb this wall, but you are able to take a long time to make ropes, sticks, and other things to shimmy up the wall, you are up there but it took so long the ceremony is already started!" etc etc </p><p></p><p>Every single Success With Complications is the kind of fun and drama people love, and it keeps the game moving on, and it lets the result "let things happen"... we did stuff, so stuff should be done...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RenleyRenfield, post: 9632075, member: 7044197"] I think you bring up a good question that is hinted at in the whole mixed success and fail and both etc etc = [B]What actually is [I]"Fail"[/I] ?? [/B] To me... Fail means "...it didn't go as I wanted it to." and Fumble/Botch means "....I screwed it all up and made matters worse" However, both of those could still possibly include "I did the action I was trying to do, but...." (then append one of the results above) [B]So Failure is always an option... it just never "Fail = nothing happens" [/B] ... What is a situation in which "Fail = nothing happens" , is [I]more fun and engaging[/I] than "succeeded with complications?" ...... Note that "fail with opportunity" is really the [B]exact same thing[/B] as "success with complications", just phrased different.... "You failed to complete the task as you intended, but [I]you still acted[/I] and did things and [I]stuff still happened[/I]. It just failed to resolve as you hoped. Which could be: it worked with less effect, it costed much more, it allowed the badguy to also get a task completed, the thing didn't work but its also not busted so you can try again, you didn't see anything but nobody saw you either, etc etc... " .... The idea behind [B]success with complications being better than 5+tiers of success/fail and better than pass/fail [/B]= is that it is the way to acknowledge that the character in fact did act, they did something, and that failure is never just 'nothing occurred at all from your action.' It also asks everyone to consider 'failure' is more than 'you don't it at all' = far more often 'failure' is based entirely on very different possibilities - none of which are 'nothing happens'. A typical example of this is "Roll to climb the wall", you fail the roll, you don't climb the wall. = what a boring result Some games go so far as to [I]punish [/I]for a failed roll, "roll to climb the wall. you failed, you fall and take damage". = ok fine, but what a tedious and one-dimensional result. Every time, always 'take harm' result, bleh.... But that is far from the only result 'fail' could mean. If we go with PBTA's dynamic of success with complications we get a better paradigm for keeping the game going and engaging players for fun. "Roll to climb the wall, you failed(Success with Complications), you made it half way up and you panic and freeze, you cant will your arms to go up or down." or "you failed(SwC), you made it up over the wall, but there were spikes at the top, and you cut yourself, take harm but you are up there", or "You failed(SwC), you can't seem to find footholds to climb this wall, but you are able to take a long time to make ropes, sticks, and other things to shimmy up the wall, you are up there but it took so long the ceremony is already started!" etc etc Every single Success With Complications is the kind of fun and drama people love, and it keeps the game moving on, and it lets the result "let things happen"... we did stuff, so stuff should be done... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Binary Success vs Multiple Levels of Success
Top