Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DanmarLOK" data-source="post: 4769193" data-attributes="member: 71480">In most cases I'm not seeing much downside to this ritual which means why wouldn't I want do it all the time?&nbsp; As a warlock for instances I now have good armour and my damage output hasn't gone down and I can mark.&nbsp; Yes my range as gone down but with the armour do I really care and I can have a broader range of options item boosts rather than just my implement.&nbsp; I could for instance borrow that +x sword from the fighter in case his weapon has a higher bonus.&nbsp; In addition the inclusion of multiple feats makes it nice, heavy armour, shield, toughness, longsword.Right now other than the range decrease (which could a big issue for some players/groups but perhaps not so much for others like a ranged striker heavy group) why would I not want to spend 5 minutes every morning and 'suit up'?I'm not saying it's a bad thing, I'm just falling on the adage if it's good enough to want all the time then perhaps it needs to be re-examined.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DanmarLOK, post: 4769193, member: 71480"] In most cases I'm not seeing much downside to this ritual which means why wouldn't I want do it all the time? As a warlock for instances I now have good armour and my damage output hasn't gone down and I can mark. Yes my range as gone down but with the armour do I really care and I can have a broader range of options item boosts rather than just my implement. I could for instance borrow that +x sword from the fighter in case his weapon has a higher bonus. In addition the inclusion of multiple feats makes it nice, heavy armour, shield, toughness, longsword. Right now other than the range decrease (which could a big issue for some players/groups but perhaps not so much for others like a ranged striker heavy group) why would I not want to spend 5 minutes every morning and 'suit up'? I'm not saying it's a bad thing, I'm just falling on the adage if it's good enough to want all the time then perhaps it needs to be re-examined. [/QUOTE]

Verification