Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Birthright Comparison with Empire
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Silveras" data-source="post: 1242102" data-attributes="member: 6271"><p>This thread is a spin-off from the "AEG Empire, How is it" thread. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The reason this answer is so long is because that goes to the heart of the rules in BR, and I will need to summarize many of them to make the answer meaningful. </p><p></p><p>Birthright divided political power into five types. Land, which any character type could draw on, and one type suited to each of the Meta-class groups: Warrior, Priest, Rogue, and Wizard. </p><p></p><p>Each character class was able to draw 0, 1/2, or 1 "regency point" from some combination of these power bases, proportional to the size (expressed as levels) of the power base. All classes drew 1 point per level of the province from land. Warriors (Fighter, Ranger) drew 1 point per holding level from Law (military or order-keeping forces & institutions); Priests (Cleric, Druid) drew 1 point per holding level from Temples (religious institutions and people's faith); Rogues (Thieves, Guilders) drew 1 point per holding level from Guilds (legal or illegal, all trade/mercantile activity); Wizards drew 1 point per holding level from Sources (magical power points); Rangers drew 1/2 point per holding level from Guilds; Paladins drew 1/2 point per holding level from Temples and from Law. </p><p></p><p>It is important to note also that, while some characters could not earn regency points from some types of holdings, it was still sometimes valuable to own them anyway -- Guilds provided Gold no matter what class owned them, as did Temples; owning Law meant that you could suppress some popular resentment no latter what class you were; and access to Sources could be traded to Wizards for favors. Also, Law holdings were required to muster troops; you could "borrow" someone's Law holding for this purpose, but the other was under no obligation to allow you to do so. </p><p></p><p>Multi-classed characters got the best of both worlds, a half-elf Fighter/Cleric could expect to draw 1 point from Law and 1 point from Temples. However, Cerilia was not so open to some of this as you might think. The elves did not have any Clerics or Druids, and did not have Temples. Most active regents were humans, and could not be multi-classed (although they could be double-classed). </p><p></p><p>Birthright worked hard to make character level irrelevant to how effective a regent your character was. All of the mechanics were tied to your Bloodline strength, a numeric score that acted as a cap on the regency coming in, among other things. A 1st level Fighter and a 20th level Wizard, with the same bloodline, were almost equally effective in leading any given domain -- the only flaw in this was that the number of free actions you were allowed was tied to your character level, so the Wizard would get more. </p><p></p><p>Birthright domains were most efficient when a band of allies of the appropriate classes divided the power bases in a realm among them: the Rogue controlling the Guild holdings, the Cleric or Druid controlling the Temple holdings, the Fighter controlling the land and Law holdings, and the Wizard controlling the Source holdings. That gave everyone in the party "something to do" in the overall government, an opportunity to be involved. Dividing the power that way was the most efficient arrangement, as no one was paying support costs for things they could not benefit from fully; but it was not required.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Silveras, post: 1242102, member: 6271"] This thread is a spin-off from the "AEG Empire, How is it" thread. The reason this answer is so long is because that goes to the heart of the rules in BR, and I will need to summarize many of them to make the answer meaningful. Birthright divided political power into five types. Land, which any character type could draw on, and one type suited to each of the Meta-class groups: Warrior, Priest, Rogue, and Wizard. Each character class was able to draw 0, 1/2, or 1 "regency point" from some combination of these power bases, proportional to the size (expressed as levels) of the power base. All classes drew 1 point per level of the province from land. Warriors (Fighter, Ranger) drew 1 point per holding level from Law (military or order-keeping forces & institutions); Priests (Cleric, Druid) drew 1 point per holding level from Temples (religious institutions and people's faith); Rogues (Thieves, Guilders) drew 1 point per holding level from Guilds (legal or illegal, all trade/mercantile activity); Wizards drew 1 point per holding level from Sources (magical power points); Rangers drew 1/2 point per holding level from Guilds; Paladins drew 1/2 point per holding level from Temples and from Law. It is important to note also that, while some characters could not earn regency points from some types of holdings, it was still sometimes valuable to own them anyway -- Guilds provided Gold no matter what class owned them, as did Temples; owning Law meant that you could suppress some popular resentment no latter what class you were; and access to Sources could be traded to Wizards for favors. Also, Law holdings were required to muster troops; you could "borrow" someone's Law holding for this purpose, but the other was under no obligation to allow you to do so. Multi-classed characters got the best of both worlds, a half-elf Fighter/Cleric could expect to draw 1 point from Law and 1 point from Temples. However, Cerilia was not so open to some of this as you might think. The elves did not have any Clerics or Druids, and did not have Temples. Most active regents were humans, and could not be multi-classed (although they could be double-classed). Birthright worked hard to make character level irrelevant to how effective a regent your character was. All of the mechanics were tied to your Bloodline strength, a numeric score that acted as a cap on the regency coming in, among other things. A 1st level Fighter and a 20th level Wizard, with the same bloodline, were almost equally effective in leading any given domain -- the only flaw in this was that the number of free actions you were allowed was tied to your character level, so the Wizard would get more. Birthright domains were most efficient when a band of allies of the appropriate classes divided the power bases in a realm among them: the Rogue controlling the Guild holdings, the Cleric or Druid controlling the Temple holdings, the Fighter controlling the land and Law holdings, and the Wizard controlling the Source holdings. That gave everyone in the party "something to do" in the overall government, an opportunity to be involved. Dividing the power that way was the most efficient arrangement, as no one was paying support costs for things they could not benefit from fully; but it was not required. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Birthright Comparison with Empire
Top