Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Black holes came first, astronomers conclude
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Angel Tarragon" data-source="post: 4628004" data-attributes="member: 23733"><p><a href="http://www.world-science.net/othernews/090106_blackholes" target="_blank"><span style="color: DeepSkyBlue">Jan. 6, 2009 | Courtesy National Radio Astronomy Observatory and World Science staff</span></a></p><p></p><p>[imager]http://www.world-science.net/images/m81-hubble.jpg[/imager]Astronomers may have solved a cosmic chicken-and-egg problem—the question of which formed first, galaxies or the giant black holes found at their cores. “It looks like the black holes came first. The evidence is piling up,” said Chris Carilli of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory in Charlottesville, Va.</p><p></p><p>Black holes are objects so compact that their gravitational pull grows strong enough to suck in everything nearby, including light. Most galaxies have at their centers enormous, or “supermassive,” black holes, whose gravity holds the stars in a galaxy together.</p><p></p><p>Carilli presented the new findings, from research done by a group studying conditions in the first billion years of the Universe’s history, at the American Astronomical Society’s meeting in Long Beach, Calif. on Jan. 6. </p><p></p><p>Earlier studies of galaxies and their central black holes in the nearby Universe revealed an intriguing linkage between the masses of the black holes and of the central “bulges” of stars and gas in the galaxies. The black hole consistently weighs about one-thousandth of what the surrounding galactic bulge weighs.</p><p></p><p>The constancy of this relationship “indicates that the black hole and the bulge affect each others’ growth” as a galaxy forms, said Dominik Riechers of the California Institute of Technology, a member of the research team. “The big question has been whether one grows before the other or if they grow together.”</p><p></p><p>Scientists have been using the National Science Foundation’s Very Large Array radio telescope and the Plateau de Bure Interferometer in France to peer far back in the 13.7 billion-year history of the Universe, to the dawn of the first galaxies. An interferometer is a device that makes measurements of light waves based on patterns that arise when the waves merge, or interfere.</p><p></p><p>“We finally have been able to measure black-hole and bulge masses in several galaxies seen as they were in the first billion years after the Big Bang,” a sort of explosion believed to have given birth to our universe, said Fabian Walter of the Max-Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy in Bonn. Observations of the distant universe reveal its state at some time in the past, since the light takes time to get here.</p><p></p><p>The evidence suggests that the thousand-to-one ratio seen nearby may “not hold in the early Universe. The black holes in these young galaxies are much more massive compared to the bulges than those seen in the nearby Universe,” Walter went on.</p><p></p><p>“The implication is that the black holes started growing first.”</p><p></p><p>The next challenge is to figure out how the black hole and the bulge affect each others’ growth. “We don’t know what mechanism is at work here, and why, at some point in the process, the ‘standard’ ratio between the masses is established,” Riechers said.</p><p></p><p>“To understand how the Universe got to be the way it is today, we must understand how the first stars and galaxies were formed when the Universe was young. With the new observatories we’ll have in the next few years, we’ll have the opportunity to learn important details from the era when the Universe was only a toddler compared to today’s adult,” Carilli said.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Angel Tarragon, post: 4628004, member: 23733"] [url=http://www.world-science.net/othernews/090106_blackholes][COLOR="DeepSkyBlue"]Jan. 6, 2009 | Courtesy National Radio Astronomy Observatory and World Science staff[/COLOR][/url] [imager]http://www.world-science.net/images/m81-hubble.jpg[/imager]Astronomers may have solved a cosmic chicken-and-egg problem—the question of which formed first, galaxies or the giant black holes found at their cores. “It looks like the black holes came first. The evidence is piling up,” said Chris Carilli of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory in Charlottesville, Va. Black holes are objects so compact that their gravitational pull grows strong enough to suck in everything nearby, including light. Most galaxies have at their centers enormous, or “supermassive,” black holes, whose gravity holds the stars in a galaxy together. Carilli presented the new findings, from research done by a group studying conditions in the first billion years of the Universe’s history, at the American Astronomical Society’s meeting in Long Beach, Calif. on Jan. 6. Earlier studies of galaxies and their central black holes in the nearby Universe revealed an intriguing linkage between the masses of the black holes and of the central “bulges” of stars and gas in the galaxies. The black hole consistently weighs about one-thousandth of what the surrounding galactic bulge weighs. The constancy of this relationship “indicates that the black hole and the bulge affect each others’ growth” as a galaxy forms, said Dominik Riechers of the California Institute of Technology, a member of the research team. “The big question has been whether one grows before the other or if they grow together.” Scientists have been using the National Science Foundation’s Very Large Array radio telescope and the Plateau de Bure Interferometer in France to peer far back in the 13.7 billion-year history of the Universe, to the dawn of the first galaxies. An interferometer is a device that makes measurements of light waves based on patterns that arise when the waves merge, or interfere. “We finally have been able to measure black-hole and bulge masses in several galaxies seen as they were in the first billion years after the Big Bang,” a sort of explosion believed to have given birth to our universe, said Fabian Walter of the Max-Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy in Bonn. Observations of the distant universe reveal its state at some time in the past, since the light takes time to get here. The evidence suggests that the thousand-to-one ratio seen nearby may “not hold in the early Universe. The black holes in these young galaxies are much more massive compared to the bulges than those seen in the nearby Universe,” Walter went on. “The implication is that the black holes started growing first.” The next challenge is to figure out how the black hole and the bulge affect each others’ growth. “We don’t know what mechanism is at work here, and why, at some point in the process, the ‘standard’ ratio between the masses is established,” Riechers said. “To understand how the Universe got to be the way it is today, we must understand how the first stars and galaxies were formed when the Universe was young. With the new observatories we’ll have in the next few years, we’ll have the opportunity to learn important details from the era when the Universe was only a toddler compared to today’s adult,” Carilli said. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Black holes came first, astronomers conclude
Top