Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Black Pudding... not splitting?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Souljourner" data-source="post: 1152483" data-attributes="member: 1622"><p>It surprised us in a reasonably small room... the cleric was trapped between it and an antimagic field that we were pretty sure would fry all his equipment (as in permanently) and who knows what else... plus we didn't realize it had so much reach until it grabbed the cleric from 15' away.</p><p></p><p>And the DM said that the pudding couldn't be split by piercing weapons, it wasn't due to an ability, it was just a DM judgement call.</p><p></p><p>Xavim - the rules say it should split. They are there for a reason. Changing that changes the encounter, and in this case, made it a lot more difficult. Having to use slashing weapons means having to attack it in hand to hand, which means you are opening yourself up to being grappled like the cleric. I don't know if the arrows were doing damage or not, it's kinda hard to tell with an ooze.</p><p></p><p>As for how arrows split it.... I'm not assuming that the arrow actually cleaves it in twain.. maybe the pain of the arrow piercing its skin causes it to pull away from the wound, making a split in the thing. I don't know the specifics of how and why an ooze splits, except what it says in the book. </p><p></p><p>And you realize, the standard black pudding is huge to begin with, so what's the difference between a 15' cube and a 20' cube? If the 15' cube can be split with an arrow, why not the 20' cube?</p><p></p><p>Also, the only member of the party who has a bludgeoning weapon was the cleric.</p><p></p><p>It was a disgustingly hard fight... normally 3 above our APL, and there were several factors that made it more difficult than that.</p><p></p><p>-The Souljourner</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Souljourner, post: 1152483, member: 1622"] It surprised us in a reasonably small room... the cleric was trapped between it and an antimagic field that we were pretty sure would fry all his equipment (as in permanently) and who knows what else... plus we didn't realize it had so much reach until it grabbed the cleric from 15' away. And the DM said that the pudding couldn't be split by piercing weapons, it wasn't due to an ability, it was just a DM judgement call. Xavim - the rules say it should split. They are there for a reason. Changing that changes the encounter, and in this case, made it a lot more difficult. Having to use slashing weapons means having to attack it in hand to hand, which means you are opening yourself up to being grappled like the cleric. I don't know if the arrows were doing damage or not, it's kinda hard to tell with an ooze. As for how arrows split it.... I'm not assuming that the arrow actually cleaves it in twain.. maybe the pain of the arrow piercing its skin causes it to pull away from the wound, making a split in the thing. I don't know the specifics of how and why an ooze splits, except what it says in the book. And you realize, the standard black pudding is huge to begin with, so what's the difference between a 15' cube and a 20' cube? If the 15' cube can be split with an arrow, why not the 20' cube? Also, the only member of the party who has a bludgeoning weapon was the cleric. It was a disgustingly hard fight... normally 3 above our APL, and there were several factors that made it more difficult than that. -The Souljourner [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Black Pudding... not splitting?
Top