Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Bladesinger - a criticism of its design
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ovinomancer" data-source="post: 7245938" data-attributes="member: 16814"><p>My bad, you did say that, but then that analysis is silly -- the odds the tank would need to do so against that kind of creature is very small, especially given a single level has the fighter killing the creatures solo without dying while the bladesinger always dies.</p><p></p><p>So, then, if we look at more realistic scenarios of only needed to tank the creature for two rounds or so, the fighter always survives barring 3 or more crits while the bladesinger dies outright (not dying, straight to dead, do not collect 3 death saves) from a single crit. This puts the odds of the bladesinger dying in 2 rounds at about 19% (4 attacks at 5% cumulative chance of crit), while the fighter chance of death is equal to getting at least 2 crits in 4 attacks or 10%. The bladesinger has about twice the chance of death of the fighter in this scenario.</p><p></p><p></p><p>No, because a crit kills the bladesinger outright whereas the Champion has a decent likelihood of surviving the encounter with his party. If you want to bring in party play, you need to consider it all around -- the Champion tank has a far higher chance of surviving multiple combats as the tank because he's not susceptible to one-shot death.</p><p></p><p>With an extremely high level of risk of outright death. Seems a fair trade.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, because, again, the bladesinger is either being a wizard, which does wizardly overshadowing, or being a risky tank, but not both at the same time. The opportunity cost for not being a wizard while you're a mediocre damage, very risky tank is enough that the bladesinger doesn't effectively become an uber wizard in the game. A similar analysis of the Mystic Theurge from 3.x had similar screaming of overpowered, but it turns out the choice to be a cleric or a wizard round to round wasn't overpowered, in fact it was a tad underpowered but very flexible. The bladesinger is similar -- the first blush is a reaction similar to yours but that actual play is fraught with choosing to be a wizard and blasting or jumping into melee and being rather mediocre about it. The trade off means that it's not either at a high degree of effectiveness.</p><p></p><p>The high AC possible from a high rolled stats for a tier 1 bladesinger is quickly eroded in usefulness as you level into tiers II and III. By tier III, that high possible AC isn't much of a factor given the very low hp pool of wizards. Sure, it looks awesome in tier I, but a lucky crit will outright kill a bladesinger. Going into melee with a 5% chance per attack of outright death when fully fresh isn't overpowered in any way -- it's high risk high reward.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ovinomancer, post: 7245938, member: 16814"] My bad, you did say that, but then that analysis is silly -- the odds the tank would need to do so against that kind of creature is very small, especially given a single level has the fighter killing the creatures solo without dying while the bladesinger always dies. So, then, if we look at more realistic scenarios of only needed to tank the creature for two rounds or so, the fighter always survives barring 3 or more crits while the bladesinger dies outright (not dying, straight to dead, do not collect 3 death saves) from a single crit. This puts the odds of the bladesinger dying in 2 rounds at about 19% (4 attacks at 5% cumulative chance of crit), while the fighter chance of death is equal to getting at least 2 crits in 4 attacks or 10%. The bladesinger has about twice the chance of death of the fighter in this scenario. No, because a crit kills the bladesinger outright whereas the Champion has a decent likelihood of surviving the encounter with his party. If you want to bring in party play, you need to consider it all around -- the Champion tank has a far higher chance of surviving multiple combats as the tank because he's not susceptible to one-shot death. With an extremely high level of risk of outright death. Seems a fair trade. No, because, again, the bladesinger is either being a wizard, which does wizardly overshadowing, or being a risky tank, but not both at the same time. The opportunity cost for not being a wizard while you're a mediocre damage, very risky tank is enough that the bladesinger doesn't effectively become an uber wizard in the game. A similar analysis of the Mystic Theurge from 3.x had similar screaming of overpowered, but it turns out the choice to be a cleric or a wizard round to round wasn't overpowered, in fact it was a tad underpowered but very flexible. The bladesinger is similar -- the first blush is a reaction similar to yours but that actual play is fraught with choosing to be a wizard and blasting or jumping into melee and being rather mediocre about it. The trade off means that it's not either at a high degree of effectiveness. The high AC possible from a high rolled stats for a tier 1 bladesinger is quickly eroded in usefulness as you level into tiers II and III. By tier III, that high possible AC isn't much of a factor given the very low hp pool of wizards. Sure, it looks awesome in tier I, but a lucky crit will outright kill a bladesinger. Going into melee with a 5% chance per attack of outright death when fully fresh isn't overpowered in any way -- it's high risk high reward. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Bladesinger - a criticism of its design
Top