Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Bladesinger - a criticism of its design
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ovinomancer" data-source="post: 7246185" data-attributes="member: 16814"><p>Sure, but aren't things already going off plan if the wizard is taking ranged or melee hits? At this point we're regulating the high AC to a contingency plan in case you're attacked while acting as a wizard. That certainly doesn't warrant the claim you're stealing a fighter shtick. it's entirely passive and dependent on being attacked by AC targeting attacks (a large number, granted). It's not superior to the effects of other traditions, it's on par. Good, not great option for tradition abilities. Also, high AC rapidly depreciates as you level.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Exactly, having a high AC doesn't take the fighter's shtick, because high AC is just part of the fighter shtick. The other bits are effective weapon attacks, high hit points, and combat tier attack versatility. All of that is the fighter shtick, and the best the bladesinger has to offer is the ability to get a slightly better AC with high stats. The extra attack the BS gets is constantly weighed against the far more effective cantrip use, which obviates the extra attack (when I first read the class, the effective uselessness of extra attack given the melee weapon cantrips leapt out at me), and the BS melee attacks are going to be weak comparative to just about any other class. Hitpoints are a clear loser. And the only real versatility in attacking the BS gets is switching up cantrips, which means more melee focused cantrips and less utility or ranged -- bad choices for a primary wizard. </p><p></p><p>The bladesinger can get a high AC, but this isn't taking anything away from the fighter. If the bladesinger tries to act like the fighter, she's not as effective and has a high risk of death outright. If the bladesinger acts like a wizard with an eye towards occasionally fighter-ing, the opportunity costs in reserved spell slots to enable the melee shtick means she's worse as a wizard when trying to be a poor fighter substitute. Again, like the Mystic Theurge, the option costs for bladesinger mean she's not as effective at either role, and those roles do not synergize in any way so the net effect is a less effect wizard risking death by trying to be a poor fighter.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ovinomancer, post: 7246185, member: 16814"] Sure, but aren't things already going off plan if the wizard is taking ranged or melee hits? At this point we're regulating the high AC to a contingency plan in case you're attacked while acting as a wizard. That certainly doesn't warrant the claim you're stealing a fighter shtick. it's entirely passive and dependent on being attacked by AC targeting attacks (a large number, granted). It's not superior to the effects of other traditions, it's on par. Good, not great option for tradition abilities. Also, high AC rapidly depreciates as you level. Exactly, having a high AC doesn't take the fighter's shtick, because high AC is just part of the fighter shtick. The other bits are effective weapon attacks, high hit points, and combat tier attack versatility. All of that is the fighter shtick, and the best the bladesinger has to offer is the ability to get a slightly better AC with high stats. The extra attack the BS gets is constantly weighed against the far more effective cantrip use, which obviates the extra attack (when I first read the class, the effective uselessness of extra attack given the melee weapon cantrips leapt out at me), and the BS melee attacks are going to be weak comparative to just about any other class. Hitpoints are a clear loser. And the only real versatility in attacking the BS gets is switching up cantrips, which means more melee focused cantrips and less utility or ranged -- bad choices for a primary wizard. The bladesinger can get a high AC, but this isn't taking anything away from the fighter. If the bladesinger tries to act like the fighter, she's not as effective and has a high risk of death outright. If the bladesinger acts like a wizard with an eye towards occasionally fighter-ing, the opportunity costs in reserved spell slots to enable the melee shtick means she's worse as a wizard when trying to be a poor fighter substitute. Again, like the Mystic Theurge, the option costs for bladesinger mean she's not as effective at either role, and those roles do not synergize in any way so the net effect is a less effect wizard risking death by trying to be a poor fighter. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Bladesinger - a criticism of its design
Top