Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Bladesinger - a criticism of its design
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ovinomancer" data-source="post: 7248834" data-attributes="member: 16814"><p>They are all better at wizarding, because none of them require mage armor as a default cast and reserving slots for shield just to be in melee.</p><p></p><p>And, if you account for crits properly, the champion does as well as the bladesinger while tanking -- they both die in the first 5 round fight. If you use either of my scenarios -- the 2 round party tanking (which is far more accurate than 5 rounds) or the solo encounter, the champion fares better because of the 1-shot nature of crits against the bladesinger.</p><p></p><p>i'm a bit frustrated that you haven't addressed the crit issue with your analysis at all and yet still insist on referring to it as if no serious challenge to it has been made made and everyone agrees with it.</p><p></p><p>Here it is again:</p><p></p><p><strong>Level 4 bladesinger</strong>: INT 20, DEX 18, 14 CON </p><p>AC: 17 (mage armor, dex), 22 when bladesinging</p><p>HP: 21, effective 36 with 1 use of shield (i find this to be the most efficient way to model shield - just add the damage from one attack to hp)</p><p>Attack routine: 1 GFB w/ rapier at +6 to hit, 1d8+4 damage to single target.</p><p></p><p><strong>Level 4 Champion</strong>: STR 20, CON 18, DEX 14</p><p>AC: 18 (platemail)</p><p>HP: 44, 53 with second wind</p><p>Attack routine: 1 greatsword w/ GWM and GW fighting style (assumed to add 1.33 to DPR): +2 to hit, 2d6+16.33 damage to single target, second attack on crit, crit chance 10%</p><p></p><p><strong>CR 4 melee monster</strong>: +3 in controlling stat, +2 proficiency</p><p>AC: 13</p><p>HP: 125</p><p>Attack routine: multiattack 2, +5 to hit, 15 damage each hit, crit damage 26</p><p></p><p><strong>Combat -- 5 rounds in melee. </strong></p><p></p><p><strong>CR4 vs Bladesinger:</strong></p><p>CR4 hits bladesinger on an 18 or better, so 15% of the time, inflicts 15 damage per attack, attacks twice per round. Ignoring criticals, this is 10% chance of 15 damage twice per round or 3 damage per round. Bladesinger can survive 7 rounds without shield use or 12 rounds with shield. Can survive 2 fights without crits.</p><p></p><p>Now add in crits: 10% chance of crit per round, damage drops bladesinger. Cannot be added fractionally, as damage does not accumulate. So, after first round, chance of crit ending the fight is the chance of no crit in each preceeding round x 10%. </p><p>1 round: 10% chance of fight ending.</p><p>2 rounds: 19% chance of fight ending.</p><p>3 rounds: 28.1% chance of fight ending.</p><p>4 rounds: 37.2% chance of fight ending.</p><p>5 rounds: 46.3% chance of fight ending.</p><p></p><p>The critical chance controls here, so at anything more than 5 rounds, even with shield usage, the bladesinger drops to statistical analysis. And, at 5 rounds, she hasa 46% chance of dropping outright. If you do 2 of these fights, regardless of anything else, the % chance of the bladesinger dropping is 92%.</p><p></p><p>Now, let's add up the damage output of the bladesinger's contribution to dropping the CR4:</p><p>Bladesinger hits on a 7+, or 70% of the time. They deal 8.5 damage on a hit, or 6 damage per round. At the end of 5 rounds, the bladesinger has contributed 30 damage, meaning her party has contributed 95 damage over 5 rounds, or 19 DPR per round. The combined group does 25 damage per round.</p><p></p><p><strong>CR4 vs Champion</strong></p><p>CR4 hits the Champion on a 13+, or 40% of the time, two attacks at 15 damage each. Crits 5% of the time, but crit damage isn't enough to one shot, so we'll add it in fractionally. 35% chance of normal hit plus 5% chance of crit at 26 damage twice per round is 6.55. Champion can last 8 rounds with second wind, 6.7 without, so survives the first fight. Without healing, will not survive the second. </p><p></p><p>Now, let's look at the damage outlay of the Champion. Using the power attack function of GWM, the champion hits on a 11+ (50%) and crits 10% of the time. So, 40% at 23.33 damage and 10% at 30.33 damage plus an extra attack for a total of 30.33 + another 40% of 23.33. That's 13.3 DPR.</p><p></p><p>Assuming the same party as the bladesinger's, the damage outlay of the group jumps from 25 damage per round to 32.3 damage per round. Instead of 5 rounds to kill the CR4, the Champion's party takes just 4 rounds. This means the Champion really only takes 28 damage, which is about half of his with second wind total of 53. He'll need a cure spell or potion between fights, but he'll make it. </p><p></p><p>This analysis gets even better for the Champion at level 5.</p><p></p><p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p><p></p><p>So, the bladesinger in melee effectively loses 3 first level slots to do be a melee tank. That's a huge outlay of resources in Tier 1 (and II, honestly), to ape being a fighter. But even with that expenditure, the bladesinger is at serious risk in melee to crits, which she cannot mitigate, because crits can empty her shallow hp pool very quickly. In a pinch, the bladesinger can be a tank, but it's a high risk, high resource cost choice, which seems okay to me and not overpowered. The Champion isn't making that cost choice to tank, and, looking at the damage outlay, the Champion stays clearly ahead and ends fights more quickly, thus reducing his exposure.</p><p></p><p>And, really, that's the bottom line: the bladesinger can expend a lot of resources to approximate the survival rate of a Champion in the melee tank role. They lose out to EKs and BMs, though, as their abilities significantly improve their tanking. And that's why it's fine -- the bladesinger can do it, but has to pay a lot for the ability, and it's still not better than what the fighter does even with very high stats.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ovinomancer, post: 7248834, member: 16814"] They are all better at wizarding, because none of them require mage armor as a default cast and reserving slots for shield just to be in melee. And, if you account for crits properly, the champion does as well as the bladesinger while tanking -- they both die in the first 5 round fight. If you use either of my scenarios -- the 2 round party tanking (which is far more accurate than 5 rounds) or the solo encounter, the champion fares better because of the 1-shot nature of crits against the bladesinger. i'm a bit frustrated that you haven't addressed the crit issue with your analysis at all and yet still insist on referring to it as if no serious challenge to it has been made made and everyone agrees with it. Here it is again: [B]Level 4 bladesinger[/B]: INT 20, DEX 18, 14 CON AC: 17 (mage armor, dex), 22 when bladesinging HP: 21, effective 36 with 1 use of shield (i find this to be the most efficient way to model shield - just add the damage from one attack to hp) Attack routine: 1 GFB w/ rapier at +6 to hit, 1d8+4 damage to single target. [B]Level 4 Champion[/B]: STR 20, CON 18, DEX 14 AC: 18 (platemail) HP: 44, 53 with second wind Attack routine: 1 greatsword w/ GWM and GW fighting style (assumed to add 1.33 to DPR): +2 to hit, 2d6+16.33 damage to single target, second attack on crit, crit chance 10% [B]CR 4 melee monster[/B]: +3 in controlling stat, +2 proficiency AC: 13 HP: 125 Attack routine: multiattack 2, +5 to hit, 15 damage each hit, crit damage 26 [B]Combat -- 5 rounds in melee. [/B] [B]CR4 vs Bladesinger:[/B] CR4 hits bladesinger on an 18 or better, so 15% of the time, inflicts 15 damage per attack, attacks twice per round. Ignoring criticals, this is 10% chance of 15 damage twice per round or 3 damage per round. Bladesinger can survive 7 rounds without shield use or 12 rounds with shield. Can survive 2 fights without crits. Now add in crits: 10% chance of crit per round, damage drops bladesinger. Cannot be added fractionally, as damage does not accumulate. So, after first round, chance of crit ending the fight is the chance of no crit in each preceeding round x 10%. 1 round: 10% chance of fight ending. 2 rounds: 19% chance of fight ending. 3 rounds: 28.1% chance of fight ending. 4 rounds: 37.2% chance of fight ending. 5 rounds: 46.3% chance of fight ending. The critical chance controls here, so at anything more than 5 rounds, even with shield usage, the bladesinger drops to statistical analysis. And, at 5 rounds, she hasa 46% chance of dropping outright. If you do 2 of these fights, regardless of anything else, the % chance of the bladesinger dropping is 92%. Now, let's add up the damage output of the bladesinger's contribution to dropping the CR4: Bladesinger hits on a 7+, or 70% of the time. They deal 8.5 damage on a hit, or 6 damage per round. At the end of 5 rounds, the bladesinger has contributed 30 damage, meaning her party has contributed 95 damage over 5 rounds, or 19 DPR per round. The combined group does 25 damage per round. [B]CR4 vs Champion[/B] CR4 hits the Champion on a 13+, or 40% of the time, two attacks at 15 damage each. Crits 5% of the time, but crit damage isn't enough to one shot, so we'll add it in fractionally. 35% chance of normal hit plus 5% chance of crit at 26 damage twice per round is 6.55. Champion can last 8 rounds with second wind, 6.7 without, so survives the first fight. Without healing, will not survive the second. Now, let's look at the damage outlay of the Champion. Using the power attack function of GWM, the champion hits on a 11+ (50%) and crits 10% of the time. So, 40% at 23.33 damage and 10% at 30.33 damage plus an extra attack for a total of 30.33 + another 40% of 23.33. That's 13.3 DPR. Assuming the same party as the bladesinger's, the damage outlay of the group jumps from 25 damage per round to 32.3 damage per round. Instead of 5 rounds to kill the CR4, the Champion's party takes just 4 rounds. This means the Champion really only takes 28 damage, which is about half of his with second wind total of 53. He'll need a cure spell or potion between fights, but he'll make it. This analysis gets even better for the Champion at level 5. [B]Conclusion[/B] So, the bladesinger in melee effectively loses 3 first level slots to do be a melee tank. That's a huge outlay of resources in Tier 1 (and II, honestly), to ape being a fighter. But even with that expenditure, the bladesinger is at serious risk in melee to crits, which she cannot mitigate, because crits can empty her shallow hp pool very quickly. In a pinch, the bladesinger can be a tank, but it's a high risk, high resource cost choice, which seems okay to me and not overpowered. The Champion isn't making that cost choice to tank, and, looking at the damage outlay, the Champion stays clearly ahead and ends fights more quickly, thus reducing his exposure. And, really, that's the bottom line: the bladesinger can expend a lot of resources to approximate the survival rate of a Champion in the melee tank role. They lose out to EKs and BMs, though, as their abilities significantly improve their tanking. And that's why it's fine -- the bladesinger can do it, but has to pay a lot for the ability, and it's still not better than what the fighter does even with very high stats. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Bladesinger - a criticism of its design
Top