Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Bladesinger - a criticism of its design
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ovinomancer" data-source="post: 7252155" data-attributes="member: 16814"><p>My argument is my argument, which was the question I answered.</p><p></p><p>Further, you single play through of an optimized combat fully supporting the bladesinger that then extraploates to a day that doesn't require extensive resource expediture doesn't invalidate my claim, it says that the best case scenario is that the bladesinger gets to be half a wizard. You may find it persuasive, but i don't find cherry picked, best case scenarios to be very impressive.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's the resource cost <em>just to enable your baseline assumptions</em>, though. A hit and a failed concentration check put the bladesinger in a very bad spot, for instance. A crit can't be ignored and outright ends the bladesinger. Having a cleric doing nothing with their spell slots but enable the bladesinger isn't sustainable, either. You claim 1 first and 1 second, but your scenario had a second 1st and 4, 4!, spellls from the cleric to enable the scenario (the two healing words to prevent one more hit from dropping both the bladesinger AND the cleric, for instance). That's nuts, and insisting it is low effort is equally nuts. You're completely ignoring all the confounders here and focusing on best cases.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Your two non-casters both are selected to optimize ranged combat and kite. Your cleric did nothing but prop up the bladesinger. You had the giants act stupidly and spread fire while allowing themselves to be affected by the bladesinger. You picked your party and their abilities to optimize the bladesinger.</p><p></p><p></p><p>You've made the assertion that wizards outshine fighters without bladesinger as a tradition. I agreed with you. Do I need to explain to you, now, how that works, or did I utterly misunderstand why you made that statement to begin with? Because I assumed it was the ability to trivialize fights and obstacles with spell usage, which requires slots, which the bladesinger is using to prop up her career as a fighter.</p><p></p><p></p><p>So you can pick a party setup that props up the bladesinger and then claim that the bladesinger is the star? Not terribly interested.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ovinomancer, post: 7252155, member: 16814"] My argument is my argument, which was the question I answered. Further, you single play through of an optimized combat fully supporting the bladesinger that then extraploates to a day that doesn't require extensive resource expediture doesn't invalidate my claim, it says that the best case scenario is that the bladesinger gets to be half a wizard. You may find it persuasive, but i don't find cherry picked, best case scenarios to be very impressive. That's the resource cost [I]just to enable your baseline assumptions[/I], though. A hit and a failed concentration check put the bladesinger in a very bad spot, for instance. A crit can't be ignored and outright ends the bladesinger. Having a cleric doing nothing with their spell slots but enable the bladesinger isn't sustainable, either. You claim 1 first and 1 second, but your scenario had a second 1st and 4, 4!, spellls from the cleric to enable the scenario (the two healing words to prevent one more hit from dropping both the bladesinger AND the cleric, for instance). That's nuts, and insisting it is low effort is equally nuts. You're completely ignoring all the confounders here and focusing on best cases. Your two non-casters both are selected to optimize ranged combat and kite. Your cleric did nothing but prop up the bladesinger. You had the giants act stupidly and spread fire while allowing themselves to be affected by the bladesinger. You picked your party and their abilities to optimize the bladesinger. You've made the assertion that wizards outshine fighters without bladesinger as a tradition. I agreed with you. Do I need to explain to you, now, how that works, or did I utterly misunderstand why you made that statement to begin with? Because I assumed it was the ability to trivialize fights and obstacles with spell usage, which requires slots, which the bladesinger is using to prop up her career as a fighter. So you can pick a party setup that props up the bladesinger and then claim that the bladesinger is the star? Not terribly interested. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Bladesinger - a criticism of its design
Top