Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Blatant abuse of the five foot step?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Silveras" data-source="post: 2506542" data-attributes="member: 6271"><p>Hit Points are a game mechanic. Characters know how much they get hurt, approximately, but they have no idea that they have 32 of 40 hit points at the moment. They can approximate how many hits they can take from a given enemy, just as the player does, but the player gets there knowing how many hit points the character has and how many hit points the attacks do on average. The character gets there by judging the experience of being hit and knowing how s/he feels. </p><p></p><p>That is very different from the Player knowing the fall can only do 2d6 damage, 12 at most, and the character gets a Jump check to make that 1d6. Even if the player fails the roll, s/he knows the character can take it easily because it has 32 hit points. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In those many falls, how many of those pits had the remains of other adventurers who <em>did not</em> survive, but whose remains were there to tell a cautionary tale ? In earning his way to 5th level, how many times did Bob or Ned fall down into a pit and wake up with the Cleric or Druid finishing a cure spell ? </p><p></p><p>The rules do not merely define the physics of the world. They provide a resolution system for actions, which encompasses representing the physics of the world and goes beyond it. I am not arguing that the character cannot survive the fall; nor am I am arguing that the character cannot estimate that the fall is unlikely to produce significant harm. </p><p></p><p>What I <strong>am</strong> saying is that the character, who does not have exact numbers, cannot have the same certainty as the player, who does have exact numbers. Certainly it is very heroic to take the chance, and by itself it is not something to protest. </p><p></p><p>What I am protesting is its combination with a Full-Attack action. The player certainly seems to be trying to squeeze an extra action from the situation, to get a free move AND the full attack action. The issue is how likely even a very heroic person would be to choose the more damaging option of throwing 2-3 daggers and falling 20 feet (to take some damage and land awkwardly) vs. throwing 1 dagger and jumping 20 feet (with a good chance of taking little or no damage) when both are viable options.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Silveras, post: 2506542, member: 6271"] Hit Points are a game mechanic. Characters know how much they get hurt, approximately, but they have no idea that they have 32 of 40 hit points at the moment. They can approximate how many hits they can take from a given enemy, just as the player does, but the player gets there knowing how many hit points the character has and how many hit points the attacks do on average. The character gets there by judging the experience of being hit and knowing how s/he feels. That is very different from the Player knowing the fall can only do 2d6 damage, 12 at most, and the character gets a Jump check to make that 1d6. Even if the player fails the roll, s/he knows the character can take it easily because it has 32 hit points. In those many falls, how many of those pits had the remains of other adventurers who [I]did not[/I] survive, but whose remains were there to tell a cautionary tale ? In earning his way to 5th level, how many times did Bob or Ned fall down into a pit and wake up with the Cleric or Druid finishing a cure spell ? The rules do not merely define the physics of the world. They provide a resolution system for actions, which encompasses representing the physics of the world and goes beyond it. I am not arguing that the character cannot survive the fall; nor am I am arguing that the character cannot estimate that the fall is unlikely to produce significant harm. What I [B]am[/B] saying is that the character, who does not have exact numbers, cannot have the same certainty as the player, who does have exact numbers. Certainly it is very heroic to take the chance, and by itself it is not something to protest. What I am protesting is its combination with a Full-Attack action. The player certainly seems to be trying to squeeze an extra action from the situation, to get a free move AND the full attack action. The issue is how likely even a very heroic person would be to choose the more damaging option of throwing 2-3 daggers and falling 20 feet (to take some damage and land awkwardly) vs. throwing 1 dagger and jumping 20 feet (with a good chance of taking little or no damage) when both are viable options. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Blatant abuse of the five foot step?
Top