Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Bless Spell and Total Cover / Line of Sight
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DND_Reborn" data-source="post: 7921508" data-attributes="member: 6987520"><p>I disagree for the <em>very reason of the passage I quoted</em>. If you attack in a space where you think an invisible creature is, that attack is with disadvantage. If you attack a space, but the creature isn't there, you automatically miss. It is right there in the text of the PHB. I you automatically know its location why have the rule?</p><p></p><p>You are basically saying the invisible stalker could walk/fly yo to someone, and unless it is <em>trying</em> to be stealthy, you "know" its location...</p><p></p><p>In the case of the Invisible Stalker, once it attacked, it moved; and we had no idea where it was--what space it had moved to. We made perception checks to try to find out if we could guess accurately.</p><p></p><p>But, perhaps, this is a reason why such a creature <em>should</em> be able to stealth as a bonus action? It isn't really hiding, it is trying to be quiet. Honestly, it was almost a year ago, and maybe the DM did have it attack one round and then hide then next?</p><p></p><p>I should also point out that with Stealth +10, and the disadvantage for being invisible (the -5 adjustment), without even rolling a DM could rule you would need a passive perception of 15 or higher to notice it without making a check. Just a thought--there is really no rule to cover it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If invisible creatures don't move around and take advantage of their ability, then you have a very kind DM. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>The stalker attacks, and can move/ fly up to 50 feet away without provoking an OA (since it can't be seen). We have no way of knowing where it went because it can move slowly even if it doesn't use its action to hide (which in this case is really moving "quietly"). Remember, in 5E, movement is movement. Unless you take the "Dash" action, nothing says your movement is "quick" or anything like it.</p><p></p><p>Now, the passage you quote about the stalker is true. And <em>that</em> is how we defeated it. Everyone started Readying their action to attack when the stalker struck. THAT is when we knew (or had a good idea anyway) what space it was likely in, and could make attacks with disadvantage. Prior to that, we were rolling Perception checks so see if we <em>could</em> determine what direction it was in. If we did, we attacked with disadvantage; if we failed, we guessed. Then we started using the Ready action.</p><p></p><p>(Note: a perception check is made to notice something, not just when something is hidden or invisible. That is why our DM allowed us to try to find it by hearing checks.)</p><p></p><p>Your interpretation of the rule is fine, but again in 5E <em>a lot</em> of rules are open to interpretation and not "RAW". While there are rules for the game, adjudicating them using common sense is how we play.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DND_Reborn, post: 7921508, member: 6987520"] I disagree for the [I]very reason of the passage I quoted[/I]. If you attack in a space where you think an invisible creature is, that attack is with disadvantage. If you attack a space, but the creature isn't there, you automatically miss. It is right there in the text of the PHB. I you automatically know its location why have the rule? You are basically saying the invisible stalker could walk/fly yo to someone, and unless it is [I]trying[/I] to be stealthy, you "know" its location... In the case of the Invisible Stalker, once it attacked, it moved; and we had no idea where it was--what space it had moved to. We made perception checks to try to find out if we could guess accurately. But, perhaps, this is a reason why such a creature [I]should[/I] be able to stealth as a bonus action? It isn't really hiding, it is trying to be quiet. Honestly, it was almost a year ago, and maybe the DM did have it attack one round and then hide then next? I should also point out that with Stealth +10, and the disadvantage for being invisible (the -5 adjustment), without even rolling a DM could rule you would need a passive perception of 15 or higher to notice it without making a check. Just a thought--there is really no rule to cover it. If invisible creatures don't move around and take advantage of their ability, then you have a very kind DM. :) The stalker attacks, and can move/ fly up to 50 feet away without provoking an OA (since it can't be seen). We have no way of knowing where it went because it can move slowly even if it doesn't use its action to hide (which in this case is really moving "quietly"). Remember, in 5E, movement is movement. Unless you take the "Dash" action, nothing says your movement is "quick" or anything like it. Now, the passage you quote about the stalker is true. And [I]that[/I] is how we defeated it. Everyone started Readying their action to attack when the stalker struck. THAT is when we knew (or had a good idea anyway) what space it was likely in, and could make attacks with disadvantage. Prior to that, we were rolling Perception checks so see if we [I]could[/I] determine what direction it was in. If we did, we attacked with disadvantage; if we failed, we guessed. Then we started using the Ready action. (Note: a perception check is made to notice something, not just when something is hidden or invisible. That is why our DM allowed us to try to find it by hearing checks.) Your interpretation of the rule is fine, but again in 5E [I]a lot[/I] of rules are open to interpretation and not "RAW". While there are rules for the game, adjudicating them using common sense is how we play. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Bless Spell and Total Cover / Line of Sight
Top