Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="GuardianLurker" data-source="post: 287547" data-attributes="member: 786">Agreed; that's why I called it a +0 bonus.Before I begin the rest of my response, I'll say that "bumping" the proposed power to the full +1 value is probably the best solution, one of the few rare cases where this is probably true.Having said that, the remaining problem is this: on the enhancement "stack" how much space does a +0 enhancement take? By extension, a +0 enhancement should take one-half the slot or a +1 and cost half as much. The problem is : what do you do when you only have one (or any odd number of) +0 enhancements on the weapon. Exactly how many more enhancements can you place on the weapon?Barring other +0 enhancements, you'll never be able to use that last +1/2 equivalent, so that +4.5 equivalent longsword mentioned above is (for all practical enhancement purposes) a +5 equivalent.The entire concept of +0 enhancements opens a whole set of other issues however. Not the least of which is creating and balancing the other +0 qualities. It'd add a layer of complexity that's probably best avoided.I'm finding the idea hard to resist, however, so:There. Now that's out of my system. Still like the +1 bump-up better.</blockquote>