Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Blind People Get Dogs or Sticks: What Do You Give A Mute Spellcaster?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Waterbizkit" data-source="post: 7017453" data-attributes="member: 6802604"><p>So one thing I didn't notice, and certainly could have missed, in the original post is the "why?" Which is to say, <em>why</em> does the player want to play a mute? I feel like the players motivation should be a big factor in working all of this out.</p><p></p><p>If the reason is just that the player thinks it would be an interesting "quirk" I think it'd be fine hand-wave this away with any one of a nearly infinite number of fantasy contrivances. If on the other hand the player has a genuine interest in playing a character with rather serious disability in their chosen field, then I see no reason to do anything more complex than hand them a spell list that contains no verbal component spells. </p><p></p><p>It would be a tough call for me as a DM if I'm honest and something I could only work out with my own player, rather than fabricate some definitive response to you folks here on a message board. My gut says to work with the player to come up with a way they can cast all the spells in a relatively normal, if quirky, fashion. But the more I think about it the more I wonder "what's the point then?" Why play a mute wizard or other spell caster to begin with if it's just going to mean a bunch of time & effort spent between the player and DM figuring out how to bypass it and turn it into nothing more than some superficial coat of paint? A big part of me would rather see player have to put themselves in that characters shoes and struggle the way the character actually would. I don't know, like I said it's a tough call.</p><p></p><p>As an aside, I've contemplated playing a character like this, only my concept is a Warlock. Of course being a DM this PC is just a dream like so many others... oh to play as a player. Anyway, the idea was to have a character who had been horribly disfigured and incapable of speech and this leads them to make your classic "deal with the devil." The idea was to go Pact of the Chain and then get the Voice of the Chain Master invocation. Of course this can't happen until level three, but I actually don't mind the idea of having to struggle through the first few levels, sort of proving the character worthy of the gift, until finally he gets his voice back... after a fashion.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, it's a cool concept but I think this is a case where the DM and the player really having to sit down and hash out the why's and motivations behind this choice before they can reach a solution that'll make everyone happy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Waterbizkit, post: 7017453, member: 6802604"] So one thing I didn't notice, and certainly could have missed, in the original post is the "why?" Which is to say, [I]why[/I] does the player want to play a mute? I feel like the players motivation should be a big factor in working all of this out. If the reason is just that the player thinks it would be an interesting "quirk" I think it'd be fine hand-wave this away with any one of a nearly infinite number of fantasy contrivances. If on the other hand the player has a genuine interest in playing a character with rather serious disability in their chosen field, then I see no reason to do anything more complex than hand them a spell list that contains no verbal component spells. It would be a tough call for me as a DM if I'm honest and something I could only work out with my own player, rather than fabricate some definitive response to you folks here on a message board. My gut says to work with the player to come up with a way they can cast all the spells in a relatively normal, if quirky, fashion. But the more I think about it the more I wonder "what's the point then?" Why play a mute wizard or other spell caster to begin with if it's just going to mean a bunch of time & effort spent between the player and DM figuring out how to bypass it and turn it into nothing more than some superficial coat of paint? A big part of me would rather see player have to put themselves in that characters shoes and struggle the way the character actually would. I don't know, like I said it's a tough call. As an aside, I've contemplated playing a character like this, only my concept is a Warlock. Of course being a DM this PC is just a dream like so many others... oh to play as a player. Anyway, the idea was to have a character who had been horribly disfigured and incapable of speech and this leads them to make your classic "deal with the devil." The idea was to go Pact of the Chain and then get the Voice of the Chain Master invocation. Of course this can't happen until level three, but I actually don't mind the idea of having to struggle through the first few levels, sort of proving the character worthy of the gift, until finally he gets his voice back... after a fashion. Anyway, it's a cool concept but I think this is a case where the DM and the player really having to sit down and hash out the why's and motivations behind this choice before they can reach a solution that'll make everyone happy. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Blind People Get Dogs or Sticks: What Do You Give A Mute Spellcaster?
Top