Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Blink automatically allows sneak attacks, what?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 2029439" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>Since the topic is mostly about Rogues, Blink, and Sneak Attacks, I think he might have meant that See Invisible might (DM dependent) override the "you strike as an invisible creature" portion of Blink and hence, a Rogue would lose his sneak attack bonus against the opponent who could See Invisible. He would still get the other benefits (and disadvantages) of the spell.</p><p></p><p>The other aspect of this is that presumably, if you can See Invisible and can tell when he is in the material plane and when he is in the ethereal plane, you could have a chance to totally negate the 20% miss chance (for being ethereal) as well. For example: "I ready my attack for when he comes back into the Material Plane.". Unlike the case where you cannot see him, a DM might allow you to do this because you can "keep your eye on him".</p><p></p><p>Some DMs might rule that since you know exactly where and when he comes back, you attack and he does not get his miss chance. Other DMs might rule that the 20% lowers to 5% or 10% because there is a slim chance he might blink back out again before the readied action (but, unlikely). Still, other DMs might rule that he still gets his 20% miss chance because he might blink back out before your readied action occurs and the readied action does not change the game mechanics. But, depending on how you rule this, See Invisibility might indeed negate (or partially negate) Blink with a Readied Action.</p><p></p><p>I do not think that the rules are totally clear on whether Blink trumps Readied or Readied trumps Blink. Game mechanics-wise, I presume that the Sage will state that Blink trumps Readied.</p><p></p><p>In fact, you may be able to Ready an Attack for when he comes back into the material plane without being able to See Invisible (i.e. he appears, I attack). How that works is also unclear and DM dependent as well.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The other cool thing about Blink is that although True Seeing can see in the Ethereal Plane and negate the invisibility portion of this, it does not negate the 20% miss chance for being ethereal half of the time.</p><p></p><p>Finally!!! A spell that True Seeing does not totally negate straight up. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 2029439, member: 2011"] Since the topic is mostly about Rogues, Blink, and Sneak Attacks, I think he might have meant that See Invisible might (DM dependent) override the "you strike as an invisible creature" portion of Blink and hence, a Rogue would lose his sneak attack bonus against the opponent who could See Invisible. He would still get the other benefits (and disadvantages) of the spell. The other aspect of this is that presumably, if you can See Invisible and can tell when he is in the material plane and when he is in the ethereal plane, you could have a chance to totally negate the 20% miss chance (for being ethereal) as well. For example: "I ready my attack for when he comes back into the Material Plane.". Unlike the case where you cannot see him, a DM might allow you to do this because you can "keep your eye on him". Some DMs might rule that since you know exactly where and when he comes back, you attack and he does not get his miss chance. Other DMs might rule that the 20% lowers to 5% or 10% because there is a slim chance he might blink back out again before the readied action (but, unlikely). Still, other DMs might rule that he still gets his 20% miss chance because he might blink back out before your readied action occurs and the readied action does not change the game mechanics. But, depending on how you rule this, See Invisibility might indeed negate (or partially negate) Blink with a Readied Action. I do not think that the rules are totally clear on whether Blink trumps Readied or Readied trumps Blink. Game mechanics-wise, I presume that the Sage will state that Blink trumps Readied. In fact, you may be able to Ready an Attack for when he comes back into the material plane without being able to See Invisible (i.e. he appears, I attack). How that works is also unclear and DM dependent as well. The other cool thing about Blink is that although True Seeing can see in the Ethereal Plane and negate the invisibility portion of this, it does not negate the 20% miss chance for being ethereal half of the time. Finally!!! A spell that True Seeing does not totally negate straight up. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Blink automatically allows sneak attacks, what?
Top