Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 2036600" data-attributes="member: 2011">Wrong again, but thanks for playing.Even when you get one actual roll for an attack per round, attacks are considered a series of feints, parries, attacks, etc. in DND.Each time he attacks on the material plane, he can see just fine.Your argument here is like stating that a Mirror Image image sometimes gets in front of a Wizard and hence gives his opponent concealment.&quot;at least part of the time his image(s) will be in front of him where his vision is obscured&quot;.His vision being obscured while on the Ethereal Plane is no different than his vision being obscured by his own Mirror Images. The concept is ludicrous in a rules discussion.Your entire premise is not based in rules.heheheThis keeps getting better and better.Now, although you KNOW from reading the Blink spell that it does not give a Concealment miss chance, you are attempting to prove that it IS a Concealment miss chance.&quot;Likewise, your own attacks have a 20% miss chance, since you sometimes go ethereal just as you are about to strike.&quot;The spell TELLS you that it is not a concealment miss chance and it also tells you WHY you miss and you still stick to your failing logic.Talk about someone whose logic is falling apart.&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p"&nbsp; data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 2036600, member: 2011"] Wrong again, but thanks for playing. Even when you get one actual roll for an attack per round, attacks are considered a series of feints, parries, attacks, etc. in DND. Each time he attacks on the material plane, he can see just fine. Your argument here is like stating that a Mirror Image image sometimes gets in front of a Wizard and hence gives his opponent concealment. "at least part of the time his image(s) will be in front of him where his vision is obscured". His vision being obscured while on the Ethereal Plane is no different than his vision being obscured by his own Mirror Images. The concept is ludicrous in a rules discussion. Your entire premise is not based in rules. hehehe This keeps getting better and better. Now, although you KNOW from reading the Blink spell that it does not give a Concealment miss chance, you are attempting to prove that it IS a Concealment miss chance. "Likewise, your own attacks have a 20% miss chance, since you sometimes go ethereal just as you are about to strike." The spell TELLS you that it is not a concealment miss chance and it also tells you WHY you miss and you still stick to your failing logic. Talk about someone whose logic is falling apart. :p [/QUOTE]

Verification