Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
blink + invisibility = miss chance?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vegepygmy" data-source="post: 5092969" data-attributes="member: 40109"><p>Because ethereal creatures are invisible. If you can see invisible things, you can at least <em>see</em> the blinking creature 100% of the time, even though you can only <em>hit</em> it 50% of the time (when it is on the same plane as you).</p><p> </p><p>What's this about ghost touch weapons not working? I don't see anything in the spell description about that.</p><p> </p><p><span style="color: deepskyblue">If the attack is capable of striking ethereal creatures, the miss chance is only 20% (for concealment).</span></p><p> </p><p>So if you have a ghost touch weapon, but can't see invisible things, 20% miss chance. Right?</p><p> </p><p>Oh, I see where the confusion lies.</p><p> </p><p>First of all, the blinking can't be happening that rapidly. Since a blinking creature can pass through walls, it must be able to move quickly enough that you can't say just because you saw him in one square a moment ago, he's still there when you attack.</p><p> </p><p>Second, and much more importantly, the game is attempting to model the confusion that would arise from only being able to see your opponent 50% of the time. Imagine, for example, that you were fighting someone in a room illuminated only by a strobe light. Despite the fact that your opponent is always on the same plane as you (effectively the same as a ghost touch weapon vs. an ethereal opponent), it would be harder to actually land a blow. Not as hard as in a pitch black room (invisible opponent = 50% miss chance), but certainly your opponent would benefit from some degree of concealment (say, 20%).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vegepygmy, post: 5092969, member: 40109"] Because ethereal creatures are invisible. If you can see invisible things, you can at least [I]see[/I] the blinking creature 100% of the time, even though you can only [I]hit[/I] it 50% of the time (when it is on the same plane as you). What's this about ghost touch weapons not working? I don't see anything in the spell description about that. [COLOR=deepskyblue]If the attack is capable of striking ethereal creatures, the miss chance is only 20% (for concealment).[/COLOR] So if you have a ghost touch weapon, but can't see invisible things, 20% miss chance. Right? Oh, I see where the confusion lies. First of all, the blinking can't be happening that rapidly. Since a blinking creature can pass through walls, it must be able to move quickly enough that you can't say just because you saw him in one square a moment ago, he's still there when you attack. Second, and much more importantly, the game is attempting to model the confusion that would arise from only being able to see your opponent 50% of the time. Imagine, for example, that you were fighting someone in a room illuminated only by a strobe light. Despite the fact that your opponent is always on the same plane as you (effectively the same as a ghost touch weapon vs. an ethereal opponent), it would be harder to actually land a blow. Not as hard as in a pitch black room (invisible opponent = 50% miss chance), but certainly your opponent would benefit from some degree of concealment (say, 20%). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
blink + invisibility = miss chance?
Top