Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
blink + invisibility = miss chance?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="irdeggman" data-source="post: 5093176" data-attributes="member: 16285"><p>Rules Compendium</p><p></p><p>pg 32</p><p>"Concealment"</p><p></p><p>"multiple concelament conditions don't stack. If a creature receives miss chances from multiple sources, such as from being incorporeal and having concealment, only the highest miss chance applies."</p><p></p><p></p><p>pg 51</p><p>"Etherealness"</p><p></p><p>"Unlike incorporeal creatures, ethereal creatures aren't present on the Material Plane."</p><p></p><p>"Ethereal creatures are invisible, inaudible, insubstantial, and scentless to creatures on the Material Plane."</p><p></p><p>"See invisibility and true seeing reveal etheral creatures. Even if a creature on the Material Plane can see an ethereal creature, the ethereal creature in on another plance."</p><p></p><p>pg 64</p><p>"Incorporeality"</p><p></p><p>"If a creature receives miss chances from multiple sources, such as being incorporeal and having concealment, they don't stack. Only the highest miss chance applies."</p><p></p><p>Blink (from SRD)</p><p></p><p>"Physical attacks against you have a 50% miss chance, and the Blind-Fight feat doesn’t help opponents, since you’re ethereal and not merely invisible. If the attack is capable of striking ethereal creatures, the miss chance is only 20% <strong>(for concealment).</strong></p><p></p><p>If the attacker can see invisible creatures, the miss chance is also only 20%. (For an attacker who can both see and strike ethereal creatures, there is no miss chance.) Likewise, your own attacks have a 20% miss chance, since you sometimes go ethereal just as you are about to strike."</p><p></p><p></p><p>So it appears that blinks causes you to be on another plane 20% of the time - which means that you can't interact with things on the Material Plane during that time (except via ghost touch or force type attacks).</p><p></p><p>Opponents have a 50% miss chance (but 20% of that is specifically from concealment) - so a 30% miss chance, except that it specifies that the miss chance is 20% even if they can see you (i.e., negates the concealment). Really poor math, but probably done for "simplicity" and not accuracy.</p><p></p><p>So since concealment does not stack:</p><p></p><p>I would say that an invisible, blinking creature has a 50% miss chance (from total concealment and can't be attacked at all unless the square it occupies is known) - whereas a blinking (not invisible) creature can be attacked with a 50% miss chance - since you can determine what square it is in. This miss chance goes to 20% if the opponent can see invisible.</p><p></p><p>Basically no additional miss chance from being invisible, only a harder time being found.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="irdeggman, post: 5093176, member: 16285"] Rules Compendium pg 32 "Concealment" "multiple concelament conditions don't stack. If a creature receives miss chances from multiple sources, such as from being incorporeal and having concealment, only the highest miss chance applies." pg 51 "Etherealness" "Unlike incorporeal creatures, ethereal creatures aren't present on the Material Plane." "Ethereal creatures are invisible, inaudible, insubstantial, and scentless to creatures on the Material Plane." "See invisibility and true seeing reveal etheral creatures. Even if a creature on the Material Plane can see an ethereal creature, the ethereal creature in on another plance." pg 64 "Incorporeality" "If a creature receives miss chances from multiple sources, such as being incorporeal and having concealment, they don't stack. Only the highest miss chance applies." Blink (from SRD) "Physical attacks against you have a 50% miss chance, and the Blind-Fight feat doesn’t help opponents, since you’re ethereal and not merely invisible. If the attack is capable of striking ethereal creatures, the miss chance is only 20% [B](for concealment).[/B] If the attacker can see invisible creatures, the miss chance is also only 20%. (For an attacker who can both see and strike ethereal creatures, there is no miss chance.) Likewise, your own attacks have a 20% miss chance, since you sometimes go ethereal just as you are about to strike." So it appears that blinks causes you to be on another plane 20% of the time - which means that you can't interact with things on the Material Plane during that time (except via ghost touch or force type attacks). Opponents have a 50% miss chance (but 20% of that is specifically from concealment) - so a 30% miss chance, except that it specifies that the miss chance is 20% even if they can see you (i.e., negates the concealment). Really poor math, but probably done for "simplicity" and not accuracy. So since concealment does not stack: I would say that an invisible, blinking creature has a 50% miss chance (from total concealment and can't be attacked at all unless the square it occupies is known) - whereas a blinking (not invisible) creature can be attacked with a 50% miss chance - since you can determine what square it is in. This miss chance goes to 20% if the opponent can see invisible. Basically no additional miss chance from being invisible, only a harder time being found. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
blink + invisibility = miss chance?
Top