Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Blog Post by Robert J. Schwalb
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Matt Thomason" data-source="post: 6327098" data-attributes="member: 6777331"><p>No, the first criticism would be "wow, these people really suck for playing that way." He isn't saying that. He's saying "I dislike how the game was moving away from my own preferred playstyle." At no point does that indicate he doesn't think it's okay to play other ways, just that he doesn't want to and would like to see the game move back to supporting his own preferred playstyle. He even goes out of his way to say it's fine for <em>you</em> to play however you want, but this is how <em>he</em> wants to play. </p><p></p><p>There is a huge difference between criticizing a game because it doesn't fit the way you want to play, and with criticizing other people's personal playstyle. Can he not state his likes and dislikes? He can't in any way, shape, or form be mistaken about his own gaming preferences, so there's really no argument to be had. Is he somehow a horrible person for wanting to play this way rather than another way? No - no more than anyone else is for playing the way <em>they</em> want to. There's no problem here with the people that simply disagree with him over game style preference and are stating that - we're all allowed to have and to state preferences - it's the ones that are coming out with insulting comments and stating he's somehow wrong to want these things. <em>He can want whatever he wants.</em></p><p></p><p>We're <em>all</em> allowed our preferences, and to state them, and to state why a product doesn't work for us and our dislike for it. What we shouldn't ever do, however, is shoot anyone else down over what their own preferences are. </p><p></p><p>I don't particularly like grapefruit, and I'll quite happily state that publicly - but that doesn't mean I'm in any way attacking people that do. He doesn't like RPGs designed such that players can mathematically discover ways to create a superior character and that give too much of a bonus to the people that take the time to find those loopholes over a player that just picked the options that narratively fit the image of their character in their head - that isn't a criticism of the people that do, it's only him saying that he wants to play a different style of game to that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Matt Thomason, post: 6327098, member: 6777331"] No, the first criticism would be "wow, these people really suck for playing that way." He isn't saying that. He's saying "I dislike how the game was moving away from my own preferred playstyle." At no point does that indicate he doesn't think it's okay to play other ways, just that he doesn't want to and would like to see the game move back to supporting his own preferred playstyle. He even goes out of his way to say it's fine for [I]you[/I] to play however you want, but this is how [I]he[/I] wants to play. There is a huge difference between criticizing a game because it doesn't fit the way you want to play, and with criticizing other people's personal playstyle. Can he not state his likes and dislikes? He can't in any way, shape, or form be mistaken about his own gaming preferences, so there's really no argument to be had. Is he somehow a horrible person for wanting to play this way rather than another way? No - no more than anyone else is for playing the way [I]they[/I] want to. There's no problem here with the people that simply disagree with him over game style preference and are stating that - we're all allowed to have and to state preferences - it's the ones that are coming out with insulting comments and stating he's somehow wrong to want these things. [i]He can want whatever he wants.[/i] We're [I]all[/I] allowed our preferences, and to state them, and to state why a product doesn't work for us and our dislike for it. What we shouldn't ever do, however, is shoot anyone else down over what their own preferences are. I don't particularly like grapefruit, and I'll quite happily state that publicly - but that doesn't mean I'm in any way attacking people that do. He doesn't like RPGs designed such that players can mathematically discover ways to create a superior character and that give too much of a bonus to the people that take the time to find those loopholes over a player that just picked the options that narratively fit the image of their character in their head - that isn't a criticism of the people that do, it's only him saying that he wants to play a different style of game to that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Blog Post by Robert J. Schwalb
Top