Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Blog Post by Robert J. Schwalb
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Steel_Wind" data-source="post: 6328548" data-attributes="member: 20741"><p>I will choose to break my long held silence on ENWorld and decloak to respond to this.</p><p></p><p>Without trying to define, delimit or otherwise declare what is and isn't "Edition Warring", I can confidently say that the importance attached to activities which fall under that definition -- whatever it is -- is of importance to certain Message Boards and discussion Forums. It has no application, concern, or any merit in describing posts, blogs or communications posted outside of those particular haunts. They are "local forum rules", not rules of general application.</p><p></p><p>Jonathan Tweet is a co-Creator of 3rd Edition. I would fully expect him to prefer his creation in any cross-comparative analysis of game systems. Indeed, I would be a little disturbed if he didn't. And if the reporting of such comments here amounts to "Edition Warring" then ... <em>whatever</em>. Mods will respond however they care to (and to be clear, they did not in this case). </p><p></p><p>Whether or not Tweet's comments, or Schwalb's, Cook's, Bulmahn's, or Merle's when engaged in comparative analysis:</p><p></p><p>i) amount to "Edition Warring"; or </p><p>ii) merely engage in a critical comparative analysis that blurs the lines in a fashion which typically leads to a "hot" Edition War thread if posted by others on ENWorld, </p><p></p><p>is neither here nor there to me. <em>I put it to you that it should be neither here nor there to you, too. </em> </p><p></p><p>These game designers are people and they get to say what they want. The amount of censorship that could be exerted under this guise (once again, to be clear, ENWorld Mods did <u><strong>not</strong></u> do so in this case) would sterilize virtually all discussions and debate. That serves no real -- or at least <em>valid</em> -- purpose.</p><p></p><p>It's a fine line with blurred edges applied in an imperfect environment in real time. Inconsistency and variations are not merely expected under such conditions; rather, they are a moral certainty.</p><p></p><p>I'm sure we'll survive, come what may.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Steel_Wind, post: 6328548, member: 20741"] I will choose to break my long held silence on ENWorld and decloak to respond to this. Without trying to define, delimit or otherwise declare what is and isn't "Edition Warring", I can confidently say that the importance attached to activities which fall under that definition -- whatever it is -- is of importance to certain Message Boards and discussion Forums. It has no application, concern, or any merit in describing posts, blogs or communications posted outside of those particular haunts. They are "local forum rules", not rules of general application. Jonathan Tweet is a co-Creator of 3rd Edition. I would fully expect him to prefer his creation in any cross-comparative analysis of game systems. Indeed, I would be a little disturbed if he didn't. And if the reporting of such comments here amounts to "Edition Warring" then ... [I]whatever[/I]. Mods will respond however they care to (and to be clear, they did not in this case). Whether or not Tweet's comments, or Schwalb's, Cook's, Bulmahn's, or Merle's when engaged in comparative analysis: i) amount to "Edition Warring"; or ii) merely engage in a critical comparative analysis that blurs the lines in a fashion which typically leads to a "hot" Edition War thread if posted by others on ENWorld, is neither here nor there to me. [I]I put it to you that it should be neither here nor there to you, too. [/I] These game designers are people and they get to say what they want. The amount of censorship that could be exerted under this guise (once again, to be clear, ENWorld Mods did [U][B]not[/B][/U] do so in this case) would sterilize virtually all discussions and debate. That serves no real -- or at least [I]valid[/I] -- purpose. It's a fine line with blurred edges applied in an imperfect environment in real time. Inconsistency and variations are not merely expected under such conditions; rather, they are a moral certainty. I'm sure we'll survive, come what may. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Blog Post by Robert J. Schwalb
Top