Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Blog post on the feel of D&D (marmell, reynolds et all)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dirkformica" data-source="post: 4137115" data-attributes="member: 49178"><p>Well I've just been reading this thread straight through and as far as I can tell this thing sort of started out as "look, here's what some people think about what they've seen and experienced with 4th edition. They happen to be game developers, some of whom have worked on Dungeons and Dragons in the past."</p><p></p><p>Then it was about how they apparently weren't allowed to have an opinion about 4E for some reason. Mainly because they didn't have all of the resources available (although this was addressed in the blog that was linked by the writer himself.) There was also some disdain for giving their opinions of "the feel" of DnD based on this incomplete sampling, which again seems odd to me since no one seems to have ever indicated that they were making blanket judgments against all of 4e, only their limited experience with the game and what they have heard/read/experienced surrounding its development.</p><p></p><p>Some also seemed to think that because some of those people writing on the blog were in the business they shouldn't be speaking out at all. I don't personally follow this line of thinking especially since they didn't seem to posit their opinions as final judgments from professional game designers, merely as a group of friends playing DnD. </p><p></p><p>Then there is the long, OCD debate about throwing sand/salt into an opponent's eyes (inexplicable to me, it seems to be ongoing.)</p><p></p><p>There was also some discussion about the value of how a game "feels," and how different people arrive at that opinion. </p><p></p><p>There's also been a good amount of"4e can do everything," and "no it can't," and "well 3.x could do it like this..." Sometimes this was an offshoot of the OCD/Autistic/Asperger's sand/salt thing. </p><p></p><p>Along these lines, there have been some general statements about not being able to judge yet because, again, we haven't seen everything and analogies were made between 4e and movie trailers. </p><p></p><p>There may be more, but those are the main points still fresh in my mind. You have to kind of love/hate how internet "discussion" follows that line from William Butler Yeats' <a href="http://www.potw.org/archive/potw351.html" target="_blank">'The Second Coming:</a> "Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold."</p><p></p><p>I'm curious to see what "rough beast ... slouches towards Bethlehem" next! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dirkformica, post: 4137115, member: 49178"] Well I've just been reading this thread straight through and as far as I can tell this thing sort of started out as "look, here's what some people think about what they've seen and experienced with 4th edition. They happen to be game developers, some of whom have worked on Dungeons and Dragons in the past." Then it was about how they apparently weren't allowed to have an opinion about 4E for some reason. Mainly because they didn't have all of the resources available (although this was addressed in the blog that was linked by the writer himself.) There was also some disdain for giving their opinions of "the feel" of DnD based on this incomplete sampling, which again seems odd to me since no one seems to have ever indicated that they were making blanket judgments against all of 4e, only their limited experience with the game and what they have heard/read/experienced surrounding its development. Some also seemed to think that because some of those people writing on the blog were in the business they shouldn't be speaking out at all. I don't personally follow this line of thinking especially since they didn't seem to posit their opinions as final judgments from professional game designers, merely as a group of friends playing DnD. Then there is the long, OCD debate about throwing sand/salt into an opponent's eyes (inexplicable to me, it seems to be ongoing.) There was also some discussion about the value of how a game "feels," and how different people arrive at that opinion. There's also been a good amount of"4e can do everything," and "no it can't," and "well 3.x could do it like this..." Sometimes this was an offshoot of the OCD/Autistic/Asperger's sand/salt thing. Along these lines, there have been some general statements about not being able to judge yet because, again, we haven't seen everything and analogies were made between 4e and movie trailers. There may be more, but those are the main points still fresh in my mind. You have to kind of love/hate how internet "discussion" follows that line from William Butler Yeats' [url=http://www.potw.org/archive/potw351.html]'The Second Coming:[/url] "Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold." I'm curious to see what "rough beast ... slouches towards Bethlehem" next! ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Blog post on the feel of D&D (marmell, reynolds et all)
Top