Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Blog post on the feel of D&D (marmell, reynolds et all)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="seankreynolds" data-source="post: 4142640" data-attributes="member: 3029"><p>Folks,</p><p></p><p>I'm not here to address salt in the eyes, or whether 3e is better than 4e, or whether we didn't have enough information to make an appropriate judgement on the limited 4e rules, or whether I'm qualified to make that judgement, or any of the other side topics that have popped up in this thread. And I'm just speaking for me, not JD or anyone else in our group.</p><p></p><p>I am here to comment on the "do they deserve to see the rules because they used to work for the company?" topic.</p><p></p><p>FYI, I asked to get on the playtest list in September.</p><p>JD asked around that time, too.</p><p>In November or December, they asked me if I would be interested in working on a 4e project. I don't them I didn't have time in my schedule but they should talk to JD, as he might.</p><p>It's now April, and neither of us has seen any playtest documents. We haven't seen anything that isn't already public info (like stuff from DDE).</p><p>Neither of us is on a blacklist; they asked me to write some 4e stuff, and JD is currently designing Star Wars stuff for them. Yet despite both of us asking to get an NDA so we can see the playtest materials and build an informed opinion (which, mind you, the NDA would keep us from expressing, good or bad), and being offered or actually doing work for the company, neither of us have actually seen the docs.</p><p></p><p>It's not a question of "deserving" to see the rules. Or sour grapes. Or an unreasonable preset bias against the new edition. I WANT to see 4E. I WANT to be able to play it and see how it all fits together. But yet again, just like with the extremely-delayed GSL for Early Adopter publishers, Wizards has dropped the ball somewhere, and because of that I am left with the same scant information that everyone else has. I could be gushing about the game right now, but instead I (and other 3E designer grognards) have, at best, a "meh" attitude toward it because they haven't given me enough information.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="seankreynolds, post: 4142640, member: 3029"] Folks, I'm not here to address salt in the eyes, or whether 3e is better than 4e, or whether we didn't have enough information to make an appropriate judgement on the limited 4e rules, or whether I'm qualified to make that judgement, or any of the other side topics that have popped up in this thread. And I'm just speaking for me, not JD or anyone else in our group. I am here to comment on the "do they deserve to see the rules because they used to work for the company?" topic. FYI, I asked to get on the playtest list in September. JD asked around that time, too. In November or December, they asked me if I would be interested in working on a 4e project. I don't them I didn't have time in my schedule but they should talk to JD, as he might. It's now April, and neither of us has seen any playtest documents. We haven't seen anything that isn't already public info (like stuff from DDE). Neither of us is on a blacklist; they asked me to write some 4e stuff, and JD is currently designing Star Wars stuff for them. Yet despite both of us asking to get an NDA so we can see the playtest materials and build an informed opinion (which, mind you, the NDA would keep us from expressing, good or bad), and being offered or actually doing work for the company, neither of us have actually seen the docs. It's not a question of "deserving" to see the rules. Or sour grapes. Or an unreasonable preset bias against the new edition. I WANT to see 4E. I WANT to be able to play it and see how it all fits together. But yet again, just like with the extremely-delayed GSL for Early Adopter publishers, Wizards has dropped the ball somewhere, and because of that I am left with the same scant information that everyone else has. I could be gushing about the game right now, but instead I (and other 3E designer grognards) have, at best, a "meh" attitude toward it because they haven't given me enough information. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Blog post on the feel of D&D (marmell, reynolds et all)
Top