Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Blog: Sneak Attack Vs. Backstab 3/28/12
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="El Mahdi" data-source="post: 5865214" data-attributes="member: 59506"><p>Uhm, What?<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused :confused:" data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" /></p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>First, 3E did not have Backstab. A Rogue could only get Sneak Attack Damage if their target was denied their Dexterity bonus to AC, or Flanked.</p><p> </p><p>There were no official facing rules in 3E, so there was no "behind the target" situation. In 3E, all combatants were considered to be moving about. There was only facing if the optional rules from Unearthed Arcana were used.</p><p> </p><p>Second, 3E did not have Attack Advantage (which seems to be the same as 4E's Combat Advantage). 3E only had Flanking, which required another attacker besides the Rogue for a +2 to attack...or with Move Silently you could sneak up behind an enemy, and if you had a successful Listen vs. Move Silently skill check, then your target was denied their Dexterity to AC, and Sneak Attack Damage applied (but not a +2 to the attack for Flanking, unlike 4E's Combat Advantage). In 4E, you do get Combat Advantage for being behind a target (unable to see the attacker or unaware of the attacker).</p><p> </p><p>The only real differences between the playtest version and the one presented in that blog is the inclusion of other classes being able to use it, the trading of your Combat Advantage Bonus (+2) for extra damage (Sneak Attack Damage), and the choice of the Rogue Class to use it or choose other Roguish attributes.</p><p> </p><p>I don't understand this purposeful ignoring of the D&D Next designers usage of 4E elements. And especially don't understand how these same people can go on making claims that the designers are purposely not including elements of 4E (as you and others have said in other threads).</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>I'm truly baffled by this...<img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/erm.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":erm:" title="Erm :erm:" data-shortname=":erm:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="El Mahdi, post: 5865214, member: 59506"] Uhm, What?:confused: First, 3E did not have Backstab. A Rogue could only get Sneak Attack Damage if their target was denied their Dexterity bonus to AC, or Flanked. There were no official facing rules in 3E, so there was no "behind the target" situation. In 3E, all combatants were considered to be moving about. There was only facing if the optional rules from Unearthed Arcana were used. Second, 3E did not have Attack Advantage (which seems to be the same as 4E's Combat Advantage). 3E only had Flanking, which required another attacker besides the Rogue for a +2 to attack...or with Move Silently you could sneak up behind an enemy, and if you had a successful Listen vs. Move Silently skill check, then your target was denied their Dexterity to AC, and Sneak Attack Damage applied (but not a +2 to the attack for Flanking, unlike 4E's Combat Advantage). In 4E, you do get Combat Advantage for being behind a target (unable to see the attacker or unaware of the attacker). The only real differences between the playtest version and the one presented in that blog is the inclusion of other classes being able to use it, the trading of your Combat Advantage Bonus (+2) for extra damage (Sneak Attack Damage), and the choice of the Rogue Class to use it or choose other Roguish attributes. I don't understand this purposeful ignoring of the D&D Next designers usage of 4E elements. And especially don't understand how these same people can go on making claims that the designers are purposely not including elements of 4E (as you and others have said in other threads). I'm truly baffled by this...:erm: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Blog: Sneak Attack Vs. Backstab 3/28/12
Top