Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Markn" data-source="post: 4842158" data-attributes="member: 21827">Examples serve as an alternative way of explaining rules.&nbsp; One _could_ argue it becomes rules as intent but if the intention is to back up the rules as written then it must be the rule.&nbsp; The example provides concrete supporting evidence to support the rule in question.Can you explain how you you find the example not inclusive?&nbsp; Whats missing?&nbsp; Since 4e is exception based, the example sets out the general frame as its supposed to happen excluding special circumstances regarding powers and/or abilities.&nbsp; You mentioned that prone should be in the sentence - I showed that it actually is.&nbsp; Is there something else that should be in there?&nbsp; Bloodied was intentionally left out because it was meant to be.As an aside, do you think the game breaks down in anyway or has specific issues if you were to agree to bloodied not working while dying?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Markn, post: 4842158, member: 21827"] Examples serve as an alternative way of explaining rules. One _could_ argue it becomes rules as intent but if the intention is to back up the rules as written then it must be the rule. The example provides concrete supporting evidence to support the rule in question. Can you explain how you you find the example not inclusive? Whats missing? Since 4e is exception based, the example sets out the general frame as its supposed to happen excluding special circumstances regarding powers and/or abilities. You mentioned that prone should be in the sentence - I showed that it actually is. Is there something else that should be in there? Bloodied was intentionally left out because it was meant to be. As an aside, do you think the game breaks down in anyway or has specific issues if you were to agree to bloodied not working while dying? [/QUOTE]

Verification