Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Raith5" data-source="post: 7106834" data-attributes="member: 56051">I really like the classes in 5e I have seen or played. I especially like the way they have done clerics, druids, paladins, rogues and barbarians (but need more subclasses).One beef I have with Paladins is the choice between smiting and casting spells - I think it is frustrating to have to make a choice between a defining aspect of the class and being helpful to the party.But the only class I would blow up would be the fighter and with it, feats relating to weapons. I would really like to see the type of weapon that a fighter uses totally define a particular fighter - especially the battlemaster (and BTW I dont think it is cool for a 25% of the PHB be devoted to spell casters and 1 page for the battlemaster). I dont think combat abilities should be feats - if your image is to be the best great weapon fighter, that should be possible by selecting the right manoeuvres IMO which are graduated by level, not a feat tax.</blockquote>