Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Bluffing the Truth
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Al" data-source="post: 340929" data-attributes="member: 2486"><p>It occurred to me that Sense Motive can sniff out liars, but if someone is telling the truth, unless you play critical failure rules, everyone is going to believe them. Furthermore, if someone is lying and someone is telling the truth, the truthteller will always win out. So here's an interesting House Rule: Bluffing the Truth.</p><p></p><p><strong>Bluffing the Truth</strong> </p><p></p><p>Strange things happen in fantasy worlds, and some people refuse to believe it even what is true. As such, it is sometimes necessary to convince people. The way this works: an incredible event is given a DC. Your Bluff check (or Diplomacy check*) is subtracted from the DC. The modified DC is the new DC for the listener's Sense Motive check. If he fails, he dismisses the claim as too incredible to be true (even though it is).</p><p></p><p>Sample DCs:</p><p>0: Everyday occurrences. Going to market, taking the dog for a walk etc. No one would doubt the veracity of such claims.</p><p>10: Out of the ordinary. Your son being kidnapped by goblins, a manticore being seen over the village. Some skeptics may find these claims dubious.</p><p>20: Unusual. This is a clearly unusual event. A dragon landing in the city centre, or the mayor turning out to be a vampire. Quite a few people will not believe the average storyteller.</p><p>30: Highly irregular. This is a real strain to believe. A visitation from a deity, a man giving birth, the entire population of a village turning into mushrooms. Most people will find your claims highly dubious.</p><p>40: Way out there. St. Cuthbert and Vecna descending and doing the can-can, Erythnul playing tiddlewinks and crying when he loses. Very few indeed will find these claims credible.</p><p></p><p>Of course, the DCs are the DM's call. These are just off-the-top-of-my-head examples.</p><p></p><p>Example: Bill the Farmer has found out that the harmless old woman who lived in the cottage is actually a disguised lich, and relates the tale to the mayor. The DM sets the DC at 25. The farmers makes a Diplomacy check and scores a 6. The mayor now has to make a Sense Motive check DC19. He rolls a 2, adding his Sense Motive of +6 to make a total of 8, falling far short. Dismissing Bill, he instructs him sternly to stay off the drink.</p><p></p><p><strong>Truth vs. Lies</strong> </p><p></p><p>The skilled liar can pass his lies across even when opposed by someone telling the truth. This is treated as an opposed roll, but whoever is telling the truth gets a +10 circumstance bonus to his roll, and may use Diplomacy* in place of Bluff.</p><p></p><p>* In both cases, Diplomacy may be used as the character is not actually lying. Hence, Diplomacy (being the skill to represent eloquent speaking and putting one's case forward) can be used in place of a Bluff check if, and only if, the speaker is telling the truth (or what he perceives to be the truth.)</p><p></p><p>What do you think?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Al, post: 340929, member: 2486"] It occurred to me that Sense Motive can sniff out liars, but if someone is telling the truth, unless you play critical failure rules, everyone is going to believe them. Furthermore, if someone is lying and someone is telling the truth, the truthteller will always win out. So here's an interesting House Rule: Bluffing the Truth. [B]Bluffing the Truth[/B] Strange things happen in fantasy worlds, and some people refuse to believe it even what is true. As such, it is sometimes necessary to convince people. The way this works: an incredible event is given a DC. Your Bluff check (or Diplomacy check*) is subtracted from the DC. The modified DC is the new DC for the listener's Sense Motive check. If he fails, he dismisses the claim as too incredible to be true (even though it is). Sample DCs: 0: Everyday occurrences. Going to market, taking the dog for a walk etc. No one would doubt the veracity of such claims. 10: Out of the ordinary. Your son being kidnapped by goblins, a manticore being seen over the village. Some skeptics may find these claims dubious. 20: Unusual. This is a clearly unusual event. A dragon landing in the city centre, or the mayor turning out to be a vampire. Quite a few people will not believe the average storyteller. 30: Highly irregular. This is a real strain to believe. A visitation from a deity, a man giving birth, the entire population of a village turning into mushrooms. Most people will find your claims highly dubious. 40: Way out there. St. Cuthbert and Vecna descending and doing the can-can, Erythnul playing tiddlewinks and crying when he loses. Very few indeed will find these claims credible. Of course, the DCs are the DM's call. These are just off-the-top-of-my-head examples. Example: Bill the Farmer has found out that the harmless old woman who lived in the cottage is actually a disguised lich, and relates the tale to the mayor. The DM sets the DC at 25. The farmers makes a Diplomacy check and scores a 6. The mayor now has to make a Sense Motive check DC19. He rolls a 2, adding his Sense Motive of +6 to make a total of 8, falling far short. Dismissing Bill, he instructs him sternly to stay off the drink. [B]Truth vs. Lies[/B] The skilled liar can pass his lies across even when opposed by someone telling the truth. This is treated as an opposed roll, but whoever is telling the truth gets a +10 circumstance bonus to his roll, and may use Diplomacy* in place of Bluff. * In both cases, Diplomacy may be used as the character is not actually lying. Hence, Diplomacy (being the skill to represent eloquent speaking and putting one's case forward) can be used in place of a Bluff check if, and only if, the speaker is telling the truth (or what he perceives to be the truth.) What do you think? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Bluffing the Truth
Top