Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Blunt arrows against undead?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Machiavelli" data-source="post: 4035354" data-attributes="member: 40964"><p>Gah! No, no, nonono. You could attach a hippopotamus to the arrowhead and it would fall no faster. The trouble with a blunt arrowhead is that it is not sleek, and the trouble with a heavier-than-advisable arrowhead is that it takes too much force to accelerate. Your blunt head will slow your arrow down from air resistance, meaning that it will take just as much time to fall to the ground that a sleek arrow would have, but even if it left the bow at the same speed as the sleek arrow it will not cover as much distance in the time before impacting the ground.</p><p>Your heavy head will have any of a number of effects. If your bow is capable of applying enough force to the arrow quickly enough, the head's own inertia may snap the arrow's shaft like a toothpick between two fingers. If the bow is only strong enough to be optimal for regular, lighter arrows, it may not be able to apply enough force to get the heavy head up to the same speed, causing the same problem that the hippo-headed arrow would have.</p><p></p><p>This last scenario actually pretty well explains the behavior of the D&D blunt arrow: the range is reduced, because the heavy head only receives the same force from the bow, over the same bowstring draw distance, gaining the same amount of kinetic energy... and hence less speed for its increased mass. The arrow has the same kinetic energy, so it WOULD do the same damage to the target if it delivered the energy the same way, but it actually spreads the energy out over a MUCH larger surface area (compared to the pointy arrow, which has a surface area at its point of less than a square mm), thereby becoming much less lethal. It's still the same energy, though, so it's non-lethal damage instead of reduced damage.</p><p></p><p>D&D archery physics are crappy, but not so bad that they can't be justified to a reasonable level.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Machiavelli, post: 4035354, member: 40964"] Gah! No, no, nonono. You could attach a hippopotamus to the arrowhead and it would fall no faster. The trouble with a blunt arrowhead is that it is not sleek, and the trouble with a heavier-than-advisable arrowhead is that it takes too much force to accelerate. Your blunt head will slow your arrow down from air resistance, meaning that it will take just as much time to fall to the ground that a sleek arrow would have, but even if it left the bow at the same speed as the sleek arrow it will not cover as much distance in the time before impacting the ground. Your heavy head will have any of a number of effects. If your bow is capable of applying enough force to the arrow quickly enough, the head's own inertia may snap the arrow's shaft like a toothpick between two fingers. If the bow is only strong enough to be optimal for regular, lighter arrows, it may not be able to apply enough force to get the heavy head up to the same speed, causing the same problem that the hippo-headed arrow would have. This last scenario actually pretty well explains the behavior of the D&D blunt arrow: the range is reduced, because the heavy head only receives the same force from the bow, over the same bowstring draw distance, gaining the same amount of kinetic energy... and hence less speed for its increased mass. The arrow has the same kinetic energy, so it WOULD do the same damage to the target if it delivered the energy the same way, but it actually spreads the energy out over a MUCH larger surface area (compared to the pointy arrow, which has a surface area at its point of less than a square mm), thereby becoming much less lethal. It's still the same energy, though, so it's non-lethal damage instead of reduced damage. D&D archery physics are crappy, but not so bad that they can't be justified to a reasonable level. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Blunt arrows against undead?
Top